...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Achieve Sustainable development of rivers with water resource management - economic model of river chief system in China
【24h】

Achieve Sustainable development of rivers with water resource management - economic model of river chief system in China

机译:实现河流河流的可持续发展 - 中国河流河河道经济模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

China has established the River Chief System (RCS) to develop mechanisms to achieve success in cross-regional negotiations of the Sustainable Water Resource Management Affairs (SWRMA). This paper aims to investigate the mechanisms developed by RCS and social welfare brought by RCS in China, and thereafter put forward suggestions for the future development of RCS. Therefore, a one-stage cooperation game was used to investigate cross-regional SWRMA negotiations with RCS. The results showed that RCS ensures that cooperative solutions are chosen in cross-regional SWRMA negotiations. Moreover, this paper used a two-stage game to explore cross-regional SWRMA negotiations without involving RCS. In this case, the involvement of the upper-level administrators and the probability of a successful negotiation are endogenously determined by local authorities. The results showed that in cross-regional SWRMA negotiations, both when the upper-level administrators are involved in the first stage and in the second stage, the cooperative solutions would be adopted. Thus, RCS is an inevitable outcome of the cross-regional SWRMA negotiations. In addition, RCS could help to avoid transactional costs and external costs in cross-regional SWRMA negotiations. Based on these results, this study provided the following suggestions: the river chief and local authorities of RCS should be stakeholders: the major members of RCS should be the local authorities influenced mostly by SWRMA quantities; RCS should actively advertise the benefits and the cost-down of SWRMA.
机译:中国建立了河流首席制度(RCS),制定了实现可持续水资源管理事务(SWRMA)跨区域谈判取得成功的机制。本文旨在调查中国RCS和社会福利所产生的机制,此后提出了对RCS未来发展的建议。因此,一阶段合作游戏被用来调查与RCS的跨区域SWRMA谈判。结果表明,RCS确保在跨区域SWRMA谈判中选择合作解决方案。此外,本文使用了两级游戏,探索跨区域的SWRMA谈判而不涉及RCS。在这种情况下,上层管理员的参与和成功谈判的可能性是由地方当局内源性确定的。结果表明,在跨区域的SWRMA谈判中,既有上级管理人员参与第一阶段和第二阶段,也将采用合作解决方案。因此,RCS是跨区域红十字谈判的必然结果。此外,RCS可以帮助避免交易成本和跨区域SWRMA谈判中的外部成本。基于这些结果,本研究提出了以下建议:RCS的河流司司长和地方当局应该是利益相关者:RCS的主要成员应是SWRMA数量影响的地方当局; RCS应积极宣传SWRMA的益处和降低成本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2020年第15期|134657.1-134657.8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    School of Economics and Management Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350116 Fujian China School of Management Wenzhou Business College Wenzhou 325035 Zhejiang China;

    School of Economics and Management Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350116 Fujian China;

    School of Politics and Economics King's College London London WC2R 2LS United Kingdom;

    School of Management Wenzhou Business College Wenzhou 325035 Zhejiang China;

    School of Finance and Trade Wenzhou Business College Wenzhou 325035 Zhejiang China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    River chief system; Water resource; Sustainable management;

    机译:河首席制度;水资源;可持续管理;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号