首页> 外文期刊>Science and society >Aristotle on Natural Slavery: An Analysis Using the Marxist Concept of Ideology
【24h】

Aristotle on Natural Slavery: An Analysis Using the Marxist Concept of Ideology

机译:亚里士多德论自然奴役:使用马克思主义意识形态概念的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aristotle's account of natural slavery as presented in his Politics is often treated by historians of philosophy as an account that can be analyzed purely internally in terms of its argumentative structure without referring to social factors. Against this view, Aristotle's account of natural slavery is seen to be ideological according to at least one variant of the Marxist concept of ideology, and cannot be understood without reference to Aristotle's socioeconomic context. The ideological nature of Aristotle's account of natural slavery is especially evident in his "protoracialization" of the category of the "natural slave." The Marxist concept of ideology is demonstrably useful in the historical study of philosophy, as compared with internalist historians of philosophy who claim that referring to non-philosophical factors such as class interests inevitably obscures the philosophical content of the texts that are the objects of analysis.
机译:哲学史家经常将亚里斯多德对自然奴隶制的描述视为哲学史家的一种描述,可以根据其论证结构在内部进行纯粹的分析,而无需参考社会因素。与此观点相反,根据马克思主义意识形态概念的至少一种变体,亚里士多德对自然奴役的论述被认为是意识形态的,如果不参考亚里士多德的社会经济背景就无法理解。亚里士多德关于自然奴隶制的论述的意识形态性质在他的“自然奴隶”类别的“ proproacialization”中特别明显。与内部主义者相比,马克思主义意识形态概念在哲学的历史研究中显然有用。哲学的历史学家声称,提及非哲学因素(例如阶级利益)不可避免地会掩盖作为分析对象的文本的哲学内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号