首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Building citizen capacities for participation in nanotechnology decision-making: the democratic virtues of the consensus conference model
【24h】

Building citizen capacities for participation in nanotechnology decision-making: the democratic virtues of the consensus conference model

机译:建立公民参与纳米技术决策的能力:共识会议模型的民主美德

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research suggests that deliberative experiences may improve citizens' perceptions of their abilities to participate meaningfully in political and societal issues. Previous studies, however, have not looked in depth at citizens' perceptions after participating in consensus conferences. In this case study, drawing on in-depth interviews with participants of a consensus conference on nanotechnology, we consider the following questions: 1) How do citizen participants feel the consensus conference experience affected their knowledge and efficacy related to participation in nanotechnology issues? 2) Which aspects of the conference (if any) do citizens think shaped their knowledge and efficacy? 3) Are citizens motivated to engage in future participatory mechanisms related to nanotechnology issues, and why or why not? Although our case study is exploratory, it suggests that even if consensus conferences have little or no influence on policy or policymakers, they may empower citizens by improving their perceived abilities to participate meaningfully in technoscien-tific issues.
机译:研究表明,深思熟虑的经历可能会提高公民对其有意义地参与政治和社会问题的能力的认识。但是,先前的研究并未参加共识会议后深入研究公民的看法。在本案例研究中,我们将通过对纳米技术共识会议参与者的深入访谈,来考虑以下问题:1)公民参与者如何感觉到共识会议的经验影响了他们参与纳米技术问题的知识和功效? 2)公民认为会议的哪些方面(如果有)影响了他们的知识和功效? 3)公民是否有动机参与与纳米技术问题有关的未来参与机制?为什么或为什么不这样做?尽管我们的案例研究是探索性的,但它表明,即使共识会议对政策或政策制定者影响很小或没有影响,它们也可以通过提高人们感知到的有意义地参与技术问题的能力来赋予公民权力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号