...
首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Between-group contests over group-specific public goods with within-group fragmentation
【24h】

Between-group contests over group-specific public goods with within-group fragmentation

机译:群体间竞争,针对群体特定的公共物品进行群体间竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We model a contest between two groups of equal sized populations over the division of a group-specific public good. Each group is fragmented into subgroups. Each subgroup allocates effort between production and contestation. Perfect coordination is assumed within subgroups, but subgroups cannot coordinate with one another. All subgroups choose effort allocations simultaneously. We find that the group that is more internally fragmented receives the smaller share of the public good. Aggregate rent-seeking increases when the dominant subgroups within both communities have larger population shares. Any unilateral increase in fragmentation within a group reduces conflict and increases the total income of its opponent. Strikingly, the fragmenting community itself may, however, increase its total income as well, even though its share of the public good declines. Hence, a smaller share of public good provisioning cannot be used to infer a negative income effect on the losing community.
机译:我们以群体特定的公共物品的划分为模型,对两组相同规模的人口之间的竞争进行建模。每个组均分为子组。每个小组在生产和竞赛之间分配精力。子组中假设了完美的协调,但是子组之间无法相互协调。所有子组同时选择工作量分配。我们发现,内部更加分散的群体所获得的公共物品份额较小。当两个社区中的主要子群体拥有较大的人口份额时,总寻租就会增加。群体内部任何单方面的分裂增加都会减少冲突并增加其对手的总收入。令人吃惊的是,尽管零散的社区本身在公共产品中所占的份额下降了,但它本身也可能会增加其总收入。因此,一小部分的公共物品供应不能用来推断对失败社区的负面收入影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号