首页> 外文期刊>New Political Economy >China's Post-Listian Rise: Beyond Radical Globalisation Theory and the Political Economy of Neoliberal Hegemony
【24h】

China's Post-Listian Rise: Beyond Radical Globalisation Theory and the Political Economy of Neoliberal Hegemony

机译:中国的后李斯特主义崛起:超越激进的全球化理论和新自由主义霸权的政治经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While China's rise has been much discussed, its meaning continues to be contested. This is true in radical international political economy, where, for example, it was the subject of (often polarised) debates between Giovanni Arrighi and David Harvey prior to Arrighi's death in 2009. This reflected a broader debate in IPE between development theory and radical globalisation analysis. The key point of contention is whether China's rise represents a challenge to or further consolidation of neoliberal hegemony on a global scale. This article critically scrutinises some of the key assumptions of the radical globalisation approach, specifically, that China represents another form of the ‘competition state’ whose development aspirations have been radically constrained by global ‘new constitutionalism’ and American monetary power so as to conform to neoliberalism. Deploying a structurationist approach to global governance and an eclectic/regulatory analysis of the Chinese state, I argue that China has challenged neoliberalism by projecting its growing power through constitutionalised global governance. In the face of (declining) American power, global constitutionalism has provided an opportunity structure that may help China consolidate its long-term strategy of consensual development. Far from anchoring ‘neoliberal hegemony’, global economic governance is increasingly central to its unravelling.View full textDownload full textKeywordsglobalisation, governance, development, regulatory state, structuration, monetary powerRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.536210
机译:尽管人们对中国的崛起进行了很多讨论,但其含义仍在争论中。在激进的国际政治经济中,这是正确的,例如,这是乔凡尼·阿里吉(Giovanni Arrighi)和戴维·哈维(David Harvey)在2009年阿里吉(Arrighi)逝世之前的辩论(经常两极分化)。分析。争论的重点是中国的崛起是对全球范围内新自由主义霸权的挑战还是进一步巩固。本文严格审查了激进全球化方法的一些关键假设,特别是,中国代表了另一种形式的“竞争国家”,其发展愿望受到了全球“新宪政”和美国货币的根本限制。权力以符合新自由主义。我认为,对全球治理采用结构主义的方法,并对中国进行折衷/监管的分析,我认为中国通过宪法化的全球治理来预测其日益增长的力量,从而挑战了新自由主义。面对(不断下降的)美国力量,全球宪政提供了一种机会结构,可以帮助中国巩固其共识发展的长期战略。全球经济治理远非锚定“寡头霸权”,而是越来越难以解决。查看全文下载全文关键字全球化,治理,发展,监管状态,结构,货币能力,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.536210

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号