...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuroethics >Neuroethics, Neuroeducation, and Classroom Teaching: Where the Brain Sciences Meet Pedagogy
【24h】

Neuroethics, Neuroeducation, and Classroom Teaching: Where the Brain Sciences Meet Pedagogy

机译:神经伦理学,神经教育和课堂教学:大脑科学与教育学的交汇之处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The popularization of neuroscientific ideas about learning—sometimes legitimate, sometimes merely commercial—poses a real challenge for classroom teachers who want to understand how children learn. Until teacher preparation programs are reconceived to incorporate relevant research from the neuro- and cognitive sciences, teachers need translation and guidance to effectively use information about the brain and cognition. Absent such guidance, teachers, schools, and school districts may waste time and money pursuing so called “brain-based” interventions that lack a firm basis in research. Meanwhile, the success of our schools will continue to be narrowly defined by achievement standards that ignore knowledge of the neural and cognitive processes of learning. To achieve the goals of neuroeducation, its proponents must address unique ethical issues that neuroeducation raises for five different groups of individuals: a) practicing teachers, b) neuroscience researchers whose work could inform education, c) publishers and the popular media, d) educational policy-makers, and e) university-level teacher educators. We suggest ways in which these ethical challenges can be met and provide a model for teacher preparation that will enable teachers themselves to translate findings from the neuro-and cognitive sciences and use legitimate research to inform how they design and deliver effective instruction.
机译:关于学习的神经科学思想的普及(有时是合法的,有时只是商业性的)对想要了解孩子如何学习的课堂教师提出了真正的挑战。在重新构想教师预备课程以纳入来自神经科学和认知科学的相关研究之前,教师需要翻译和指导才能有效地使用有关大脑和认知的信息。如果没有这样的指导,教师,学校和学区可能会浪费时间和金钱去追求所谓的“基于大脑”的干预措施,而这些干预措施缺乏坚实的研究基础。同时,我们的学校的成功将继续由成就标准来狭窄地定义,这些成就标准忽略了学习的神经和认知过程的知识。为了实现神经教育的目标,其支持者必须解决神经教育对五个不同群体提出的独特的伦理问题:a)执业教师,b)其工作可以为教育提供信息的神经科学研究者,c)出版商和流行媒体,d)教育政策制定者,以及e)大学水平的教师教育者。我们提出了应对这些道德挑战的方法,并为教师的准备提供了一个模型,这将使​​教师自己能够转化神经科学和认知科学的发现,并利用合法的研究来告知他们如何设计和提供有效的指导。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Neuroethics》 |2012年第2期|p.135-143|共9页
  • 作者单位

    School of Education, Johns Hopkins University, 2800 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA;

    School of Education, Johns Hopkins University, 2800 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA;

    School of Education, Johns Hopkins University, 2800 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA;

    School of Education, Johns Hopkins University, 2800 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Educational neuroethics; Neuroeducation; Pedagogy; Classroom instruction;

    机译:教育神经伦理学;神经教育;教学法;课堂教学;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号