首页> 外文期刊>Nationalities Papers >Liberal nationalism, nationalist liberalization, and democracy: the cases of post-Soviet Estonia and Ukraine
【24h】

Liberal nationalism, nationalist liberalization, and democracy: the cases of post-Soviet Estonia and Ukraine

机译:自由民族主义,民族主义自由化和民主:后苏联爱沙尼亚和乌克兰的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The bulk of scholarly literature views nationalism as harmful to democratic transition. Yet Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan indirectly suggest that nationalism may benefit democratization. This study shows that under the right conditions nationalism can benefit democratic transition. Building on the typology of Linz and Stepan and the liberal nationalism tradition of Yael Tamir and David Miller, this study examines the transitions in Estonia and Ukraine. It introduces an important layer, the multinational federal state, into the typologies developed by Linz and Stepan to show that nationalism can prove a useful political tool of mobilization in a multiethnic setting.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemocratization, nationalism, liberalization, Estonia, UkraineRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2010.484062
机译:大多数学术文献都认为民族主义对民主过渡有害。然而,胡安·林茨和阿尔弗雷德·斯捷潘间接暗示,民族主义可能有益于民主化。这项研究表明,在正确的条件下,民族主义可以使民主过渡受益。基于林茨和斯蒂芬的类型学以及耶尔·塔米尔和大卫·米勒的自由民族主义传统,本研究考察了爱沙尼亚和乌克兰的过渡时期。它在林茨和斯蒂芬开发的类型学中引入了一个重要的层,即多国联邦制,以表明民族主义可以证明在多民族环境中动员起来的有用的政治工具。查看全文addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2010.484062

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号