...
首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Plugged in
【24h】

Plugged in

机译:插入

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

What do we mean by efficiency? It seems like a straightforward question, but as we found at a recent Localis and Capita Symonds roundta-ble discussion, the answer is not as obvious as one might think. The term, it seems, can mean different things to different people or even political parties. The discussion, which included council leaders and chief executives from across the country, highlighted several factors underpinning the apparent complexity. Firstly, as was made clear in the discussion, the different approaches to efficiency broadly shifted in line with changes in Government over time. The Compulsory Competitive Tendering era of the 1980s and early 1990s led to a predominant focus on cost, often to the detriment of wider social or environmental considerations. The 'Best Value' regime, brought in by Labour, moved the debate away from cost alone. However, it was arguably too ambiguous, and left councils vulnerable to central Government's interpretation and implementation of'value'.
机译:效率是什么意思?这似乎是一个简单的问题,但是正如我们在最近的Localis和Capita Symonds圆桌讨论中所发现的那样,答案并不像人们想象的那么明显。这个词似乎对不同的人甚至政党意味着不同的意思。包括来自全国各地的理事会领导人和首席执行官在内的讨论强调了明显复杂性的几个因素。首先,正如在讨论中明确指出的那样,随着时间的流逝,不同的效率提高方法大体上发生了变化。 1980年代和1990年代初的强制性竞争性招标时代导致人们对成本的重视,往往损害了更广泛的社会或环境因素。工党提出的“最佳价值”制度使辩论不再仅仅局限于成本。但是,它可以说是过于模棱两可,使议会容易受到中央政府对“价值”的解释和实施的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2011年第22期|p.16|共1页
  • 作者

    Tom Shakespeare;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号