首页> 外文期刊>Journal of transportation management >CONFLICTING PERSPECTIVES ON THE GOVERNMENT MANDATE FOR THE USE OF ELECTRONIC ON-BOARD RECORDING DEVICES IN COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES: A CASE STUDY
【24h】

CONFLICTING PERSPECTIVES ON THE GOVERNMENT MANDATE FOR THE USE OF ELECTRONIC ON-BOARD RECORDING DEVICES IN COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES: A CASE STUDY

机译:在商业汽车中使用电子车载记录设备的政府授权冲突的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In July of 2012, the President signed into law the bill, "Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century" or MAP21, also known as the Surface Transportation Act. The Act instructs the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate regulations requiring the use of electronic on-board recording devices (EOBRs) to verify hours of service compliance by commercial motor vehicle drivers. The mandate has drawn opposition from many drivers and trade organizations, while simultaneously drawing support from government, union organizations and other trade organizations. Consequently, it appears that the EOBR mandate will continue to be a source of potential conflict for management and commercial motor vehicle drivers in some transportation organizations. This case study analyzes some of the factors involved and proposes recommendations for the mitigation of potential workplace conflict.
机译:2012年7月,总统签署了《迈向21世纪的进步》或MAP21(也称为《地面运输法》)的法案,将其法律化。该法令指示运输部长颁布法规,要求使用电子车载记录设备(EOBR)来验证商用机动车驾驶员的服役时间。这项任务引起了许多司机和贸易组织的反对,同时也得到了政府,工会组织和其他贸易组织的支持。因此,在某些运输组织中,EOBR任务似乎仍将是管理人员和商用车辆驾驶员潜在冲突的根源。本案例研究分析了其中的一些因素,并提出了缓解潜在工作场所冲突的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号