首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Portfolio Management >Diversifying the Diversifiers and Tracking the Tracking Error: Outperforming Cap-Weighted Indices with Limited Risk of Underperformance
【24h】

Diversifying the Diversifiers and Tracking the Tracking Error: Outperforming Cap-Weighted Indices with Limited Risk of Underperformance

机译:对多元化经营者进行多元化经营并追踪跟踪误差:表现不佳的风险有限的领先于加盖加权指数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A number of quantitative or fundamental weighting schemes have been shown to produce robust outperformance with respect to standard cap-weighted equity indices over long time periods. Over periods ranging from a few months to a few years, however, such alternative weighting schemes can generate substantial downside risk relative to cap-weighted indices, which would be a source of concern for most investment managers or chief investment officers. In this article, the authors focus on two reasonable proxies for well-diversified, efficient frontier portfolios, namely, the maximum Sharpe ratio (MSR) portfolio and the global minimum volatility (GMV) portfolio. They address the question of how to use these building blocks to design an improved equity benchmark while satisfying target levels of average and extreme tracking error with respect to cap-weighted indices. The authors find that robust proxies for the GMV portfolio provide defensive exposure to equity that does well in adverse market conditions, while robust proxies for MSR portfolios provide greater access to the upside of equity markets. Because the relative performance of these two diversification approaches depends on market conditions, they expect a combination of both approaches to lead to a smoother conditional performance and higher probability of outperformance of the cap-weighted index, an intuition that is confirmed in empirical tests. Empirical analysis also suggests that "diversifying the diversifiers" still leads to high levels of relative downside risk, in particular when the performance of cap-weighted indices is unusually strong. In this context, the authors introduce an explicit relative risk control mechanism designed to reduce the consequences of severe short-term underperformance with respect to the cap-weighted index and confirm through out-of-sample empirical tests that "tracking the tracking error" would allow investors to achieve better access to outperformance per unit of extreme relative risk taken. Overall, the results reported in this article suggest that it is possible to achieve robust outperformance versus cap-weighted indices by diversifying model risk and by controlling relative risk compared to the cap-weighted indices.
机译:大量的定量或基本加权方案已显示出在较长时期内相对于标准上限加权股票指数表现出强劲的表现。但是,在几个月到几年的时间范围内,相对于上限加权指数而言,这种替代加权方案可能会产生巨大的下行风险,这将是大多数投资经理或首席投资官关注的问题。在本文中,作者集中于两个合理的代理,它们分别代表多样化的有效边界投资组合,即最大夏普比率(MSR)投资组合和全球最小波动率(GMV)投资组合。他们提出了一个问题,即如何使用这些构建基块来设计改进的股权基准,同时又要满足关于上限加权指数的平均和极端跟踪误差的目标水平。作者发现,GMV投资组合的强大代理可以提供在不利市场条件下表现出色的股票防御性敞口,而MSR投资组合的强大代理可以提供更多进入股票市场的机会。由于这两种分散方法的相对表现取决于市场状况,因此他们期望这两种方法的组合可以使条件表现更平滑,上限加权指数表现出更高的可能性,这在经验测试中得到了证实。实证分析还表明,“使多样化者多样化”仍然会导致较高的相对下行风险,特别是当上限加权指数的表现异常强劲时。在这种情况下,作者引入了一个明确的相对风险控制机制,旨在减少相对于上限加权指数而言严重的短期业绩不佳的后果,并通过样本外的经验测试确认“跟踪跟踪误差”会使投资者能够更好地利用单位承受的极端相对风险而取得超越业绩的机会。总体而言,本文报道的结果表明,通过使模型风险多样化并控制与市值加权指数相比的相对风险,有可能实现相对于市值加权指数稳健的表现。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Journal of Portfolio Management》 |2012年第3期|p.72-88|共17页
  • 作者单位

    EDHEC Business School and a director of EDHEC-Risk Institute in London, UK;

    EDHEC Business School in Nice, France;

    EDHEC-Risk Institute at EDHEC Business School in Nice, France;

    EDHEC Business School and scientific director of EDHEC-Risk Institute in Nice, France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号