...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hazardous Materials >Multi-stage ranking of emergency technology alternatives for water source pollution accidents using a fuzzy group decision making tool
【24h】

Multi-stage ranking of emergency technology alternatives for water source pollution accidents using a fuzzy group decision making tool

机译:使用模糊群决策工具对水源污染事故应急技术替代方案进行多阶段排序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Due to the increasing number of unexpected water source pollution events, selection of the most appropriate disposal technology for a specific pollution scenario is of crucial importance to the security of urban water supplies. However, the formulation of the optimum option is considerably difficult owing to the substantial uncertainty of such accidents. In this research, a multi-stage technical screening and evaluation tool is proposed to determine the optimal technique scheme, considering the areas of pollutant elimination both in drinking water sources and water treatment plants. In stage 1, a CBR-based group decision tool was developed to screen available technologies for different scenarios. Then, the threat degree caused by the pollution was estimated in stage 2 using a threat evaluation system and was partitioned into four levels. For each threat level, a corresponding set of technique evaluation criteria weights was obtained using Group-G1. To identify the optimization alternatives corresponding to the different threat levels, an extension of TOPSIS, a multi-criteria interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy decision making technique containing the four arrays of criteria weights, to a group decision environment was investigated in stage 3. The effectiveness of the developed tool was elaborated by two actual thallium-contaminated scenarios associated with different threat levels. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:由于意外的水源污染事件的数量不断增加,针对特定污染情况选择最合适的处理技术对于城市供水的安全至关重要。但是,由于此类事故的不确定性,制定最佳选择方案非常困难。在这项研究中,提出了一种多阶段技术筛选和评估工具来确定最佳技术方案,同时考虑到饮用水源和水处理厂的污染物消除领域。在第1阶段,开发了基于CBR的团队决策工具,以筛选适用于不同场景的可用技术。然后,在第二阶段使用威胁评估系统估算由污染引起的威胁程度,并将其划分为四个级别。对于每个威胁级别,使用Group-G1获得了一组相应的技术评估标准权重。为了确定与不同威胁级别相对应的优化方案,在阶段3中研究了TOPSIS(一种包含四个标准权重数组的多标准区间值梯形模糊决策技术)的扩展,以进行群决策。所开发工具的功能是通过两种实际的th污染场景(与不同威胁级别相关联)来阐述的。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号