...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of futures markets >Can limits-to-arbitrage from bounded storage improve commodity term-structure modeling?
【24h】

Can limits-to-arbitrage from bounded storage improve commodity term-structure modeling?

机译:有限存储的套利限制是否可以改善商品期限结构模型?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper develops and estimates a two-factor competitive storage model for the purpose of pricing commodity futures. The empirical relevance of the model is evaluated for US natural gas and crude oil futures by comparing the pricing performance to reduced form models. Results suggest jump models, both reduced form and economic, improve modeling due to incorporating pricing discontinuities. Furthermore, the economic model precludes carry arbitrage, which appears relevant for pricing natural gas futures. For crude oil, the reduced form models produce superior pricing under nonstationary market conditions, and the economic model produces superior long-dated futures pricing under stationarity.
机译:本文为定价商品期货而开发并估计了一个两因素竞争性存储模型。通过将定价表现与简化表模型进行比较,评估了该模型对美国天然气和原油期货的经验相关性。结果表明,由于合并了价格不连续性,跳跃模型(既简化形式又节省了经济性)改进了建模。此外,经济模型排除套利套利,这似乎与天然气期货定价有关。对于原油,简化形式模型在非平稳市场条件下产生较高的定价,而经济模型在平稳状态下产生较高的长期期货定价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号