...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Food Science >Determination of Very Low Levels of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-furaldehyde (HMF) in Natural Honey: Comparison Between the HPLC Technique and the Spectrophotometric White Method
【24h】

Determination of Very Low Levels of 5-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-furaldehyde (HMF) in Natural Honey: Comparison Between the HPLC Technique and the Spectrophotometric White Method

机译:天然蜂蜜中极低含量的5-(羟甲基)-2-糠醛(HMF)测定:HPLC技术与分光光度法白度法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this work we compared 2 official methods for the determination of HMF in honey, the spectrophotometric White method and the HPLC method (International Honey Commission) for the determination of HMF in unifloral honey and honeydew samples with a very low HMF content (<4 mg/kg), which is the most critical determination in terms of accuracy and precision of methods. In honey solutions, the limits of quantification for HPLC and White methods are 0.83 mg/L and 0.67 mg/L, respectively, and the linearity range is confirmed up to 20 mg/L for the HPLC method and up to 5 mg/L for the White method. In honeys with HMF >5 mg/kg, the molar extinction coefficient is 15369, lower than the literature value of 16830, and should be used for HMF determination. For samples with HMF content in the range 1-4 mg/kg the accuracy of the 2 methods is comparable both for unifloral and honeydew samples, whereas as regards precision, the HPLC method gives better results (3.5% compared with 6.4% for the White method). So, in general, the HPLC method seems to be more appropriate for the determination of HMF in honey in the range 1-4 mg/kg thanks to its greater precision, but for samples with a HMF content of less than 1 mg/kg the analyses are inaccurate for both methods.
机译:在这项工作中,我们比较了两种测定蜂蜜中HMF的官方方法,分光光度法White方法和HPLC方法(国际蜂蜜委员会)测定单花蜂蜜和HMF含量很低(<4 mg / kg),这是方法准确性和精确度方面最关键的决定。在蜂蜜溶液中,HPLC和White方法的定量限分别为0.83 mg / L和0.67 mg / L,并且线性范围已确定为HPLC方法高达20 mg / L和HPLC方法高达5 mg / L。白色方法。在HMF> 5 mg / kg的蜂蜜中,摩尔消光系数为15369,低于文献值16830,应该用于HMF测定。对于HMF含量在1-4 mg / kg范围内的样品,单方法和蜜露方法的两种方法的准确性均相当,而就精密度而言,HPLC方法可提供更好的结果(3.5%,而白色方法为6.4%方法)。因此,总的来说,HPLC方法似乎更适合于蜂蜜中HMF的测定,其精度更高,范围为1-4 mg / kg,但是对于HMF含量小于1 mg / kg的样品,HPLC方法似乎更适合。两种方法的分析都不准确。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Food Science》 |2012年第9期|p.C784-C790|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Dept.of Marine Science, Univ.Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 60131 Ancona, Italy;

    Dept.of Marine Science, Univ.Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 60131 Ancona, Italy;

    Dept.of Marine Science, Univ.Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 60131 Ancona, Italy;

    Dept.of Marine Science, Univ.Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 60131 Ancona, Italy;

    ASSAM (Agenzia Servizi Settore Agroalimentare delle Marche), Centra Agrochimico Regionale, Via Roncaglia 20, 60035 Jesi (An), Italy;

    Dept.of Marine Science, Univ.Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 60131 Ancona, Italy;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    food analysis; HMF; honey; HPLC; spectrophotometry;

    机译:食品分析;HMF;蜜糖;HPLC;分光光度法;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号