首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Extended Enrichment Procedures Can Be Used To Define False-Negative Probabilities for Cultural Gold Standard Methods for Salmonella Detection, Facilitating Comparisons between Gold Standard and Alternative Methods
【24h】

Extended Enrichment Procedures Can Be Used To Define False-Negative Probabilities for Cultural Gold Standard Methods for Salmonella Detection, Facilitating Comparisons between Gold Standard and Alternative Methods

机译:扩展的浓缩程序可用于定义用于沙门氏菌检测的文化金标准方法的假阴性概率,促进金标准和替代方法之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evaluation of alternative detection methods for foodbome pathogens typically involves comparisons against a "gold standard" culture method, which may produce false-negative (FN) results, particularly under worst-case scenarios such as low contamination levels, difficult-to-detect strains, and challenging food matrices (e.g., matrices with a water activity of <0.6). We used extended enrichment times (up to 72 h for both primary and secondary enrichments) to evaluate a gold standard method for Salmonella detection (the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual [BAM] method) in two low-water-activity foods (dry pet food and chocolate) inoculated at low contamination levels (most probable number ca. 1/25 g) with five Salmonella strains. Strains were selected to include those with a poor ability to grow in enrichment media. Among the 100 pet food and 100 chocolate samples tested, 53 and 50, respectively, were positive with the standard BAM method, and 57 and 59, respectively, were positive with the extended BAM method. Thus, the FN probabilities for the standard BAM method were 7% for pet food and 15% for chocolate. An alternative enzyme immunoassay method for detection of Salmonella in chocolate produced FN probabilities of 6 and 20% when compared against the standard and extended BAM methods, respectively. Detection of Salmonella Mississippi was significantly reduced with the alternative method (P = 0.023) compared with the extended BAM method. We calculated a composite reference standard to further define FN probabilities based on variable results from multiple assays (the standard BAM, extended BAM, and alternative methods). Based on this standard, the enzyme immunoassay for Salmonella detection in chocolate had a 28% FN probability and the standard and extended BAM methods had 23 and 9% FN probabilities, respectively. These results provide a framework for how inclusion of extended enrichment times can facilitate evaluation of alternative detection methods.
机译:用于食物组群病原体的替代检测方法的评价通常涉及对“金标准”培养方法的比较,这可能产生假阴性(FN)结果,特别是在诸如低污染水平,难以检测的菌株的最坏情况下,并具有挑战性的食物基质(例如,具有<0.6的水活性的矩阵)。我们使用扩展的富集时间(最多72小时,初级和二级浓缩),以评估两种低水力活性食物中的沙门氏菌检测(美国食品和药物和药物和药物施用手术手册[BAM]方法)的黄金标准方法(干宠物食品和巧克力)接种在低污染水平(最可能的数量Ca.1 / 25g),其中包含五种沙门氏菌菌株。选择菌株以包括在富集培养基中生长差的那些。在测试的100个宠物食品和100个巧克力样品中,分别与标准BAM方法分别为阳性,分别与延长的BAM方法分别为阳性。因此,宠物食品的标准BAM方法的FN概率为7%,巧克力为15%。替代酶免疫测定方法,用于检测巧克力中的沙门氏菌,其在与标准和延伸的BAM方法相比分别在6和20%的概率中产生的FN概率。与延伸的BAM方法相比,替代方法(P = 0.023)显着降低了沙门氏菌的检测。我们计算了基于多种测定(标准BAM,扩展BAM和替代方法)的可变结果来进一步定义FN概率的复合参考标准。基于该标准,巧克力中的沙门氏菌检测的酶免疫测定具有28%的FN概率,并且标准和扩展BAM方法分别具有23%和9%的FN概率。这些结果提供了一种框架,用于纳入巨大的富集时间可以促进替代检测方法的评估。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2020年第6期|1030-1037|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Food Science College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA;

    Department of Food Science College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA;

    Department of Food Science College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA;

    Department of Food Science College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA;

    Department of Food Science College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA;

    Mars Global Food Safety Center Huairou Beijing People's Republic of China;

    Mars Global Food Safety Center Huairou Beijing People's Republic of China;

    Mars Global Food Safety Center Huairou Beijing People's Republic of China;

    Department of Food Science College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA;

    Department of Food Science The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania 16802 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Assay evaluation; Food safety; Gold standard; Low-moisture foods; Salmonella;

    机译:测定评估;食品安全;黄金标准;低湿度食物;沙门氏菌;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号