首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food process engineering >Effects of radio frequency, air and water tempering, and different end-point tempering temperatures on pork quality
【24h】

Effects of radio frequency, air and water tempering, and different end-point tempering temperatures on pork quality

机译:射频,空气和水的回火以及不同的终点回火温度对猪肉品质的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To explore the effects of different tempering methods and end-tempering temperature on pork quality, 1 kg frozen lean pork samples in cuboid shapes were treated under radio frequency tempering (3 kW, 27.12 MHz), water tempering, and air tempering from -22 degrees C to -1 degrees C and -4 degrees C, respectively. Tempering time, temperature distribution, drip loss, cook loss, pH, color, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) value, total volatile base nitrogen (TVBN) value of tempered samples were evaluated for comparison. Results showed both tempering methods and tempering temperature had significant (p 0.05) effects on pork quality. The tempering time needed for water and air tempering were about 9 and 17 times longer than radio frequency tempering to reach -1 degrees C, respectively (p 0.05). From the tempering temperature point of view, when tempered to -1 degrees C, no significant effect was found on physical and chemical properties of pork samples than tempered to -4 degrees C (p 0.05) expect for the increased drip loss, cook loss and the decreased pH (p 0.05). From the tempering method point of view, air tempering retains the most physiochemical properties of fresh pork samples except for a higher cook loss, and a lower pH when tempering to -1 degrees C (p 0.05). The cook loss, TVBN and b* values were significantly higher, and the pH and L* values were lower (p 0.05) in water immersion tempering to -1 degrees C than those of fresh samples. Meanwhile, the cook loss, TVBN and b* was higher, and pH was lower than those of fresh values (p 0.05) after radio frequency tempering to -1 degrees C. In general, air tempering retained the best quality of pork samples, and radio frequency tempering showed the fastest tempering rate while also resulted in an acceptable meat quality, which has the potential of being further applied to meat industry. Practical application Results in this study provide sufficient data to the meat industry for selecting appropriate tempering method and target tempering temperature based on specific requirements. Results reveal that radio frequency tempering was fast and relatively uniform, which had the capability of defrosting meat blocks in the desired short time with acceptable physiochemical properties. However, radio frequency tempering also showed its limitation on non-uniform heating especially at targeting temperature of -1 degrees C. This reminds the meat industry to carefully design tempering protocols with appropriate tempering rate and endpoint temperature when applying radio frequency technology.
机译:为了探究不同回火方法和终回火温度对猪肉品质的影响,在射频回火(3 kW,27.12 MHz),水回火和-22度的空气回火下处理了1千克长方体形状的冷冻瘦猪肉样品C分别为-1摄氏度和-4摄氏度。评估回火样品的回火时间,温度分布,滴落损失,蒸煮损失,pH,颜色,硫代巴比妥酸反应性物质(TBARS)值,总挥发性碱氮(TVBN)值以进行比较。结果表明,回火方法和回火温度均对猪肉品质有显着影响(p <0.05)。水和空气回火所需的回火时间分别比射频回火达到-1摄氏度长9倍和17倍(p <0.05)。从回火温度的角度来看,回火到-1摄氏度时,对猪肉样品的物理和化学性能没有发现明显的影响,而回火到-4摄氏度(p> 0.05)则表明滴水损失,蒸煮损失增加pH值降低(p <0.05)。从回火方法的角度来看,空气回火保留了新鲜猪肉样品的大多数理化特性,除了较高的蒸煮损耗和回火至-1摄氏度时的pH值较低(p <0.05)。与新鲜样品相比,在水浸回火至-1摄氏度的条件下,蒸煮损失,TVBN和b *值明显更高,pH和L *值更低(p <0.05)。同时,在射频回火至-1摄氏度后,蒸煮损失,TVBN和b *较高,pH低于新鲜值(p <0.05)。总体而言,空气回火保留了猪肉样品的最佳质量,射频回火显示出最快的回火速度,同时还获得了令人满意的肉品质,这有可能进一步应用于肉类行业。实际应用这项研究的结果为肉类行业提供了足够的数据,用于根据特定要求选择合适的回火方法和目标回火温度。结果表明,射频回火是快速且相对均匀的,具有在期望的短时间内为肉块除霜的能力,并具有可接受的理化特性。但是,射频回火也显示出其对非均匀加热的局限性,尤其是在目标温度为-1摄氏度的情况下。这提醒了肉类行业在应用射频技术时要精心设计回火协议,以适当的回火速率和终点温度进行。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food process engineering》 |2019年第4期|e13026.1-e13026.8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Shanghai Ocean Univ, Coll Food Sci & Technol, Dept Food Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China|Shanghai Ocean Univ, Res Ctr Food Thermal Proc Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China;

    Shanghai Ocean Univ, Coll Food Sci & Technol, Dept Food Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China|Shanghai Ocean Univ, Res Ctr Food Thermal Proc Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China|Shanghai Ocean Univ, Res Ctr Freshwater Aquat Prod Proc Technol Shangh, Shanghai, Peoples R China;

    Washington State Univ, Dept Biosyst Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA;

    Shanghai Ocean Univ, Coll Food Sci & Technol, Dept Food Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China|Shanghai Ocean Univ, Res Ctr Food Thermal Proc Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China;

    Shanghai Ocean Univ, Coll Food Sci & Technol, Dept Food Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China|Shanghai Ocean Univ, Res Ctr Food Thermal Proc Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China|Shanghai Ocean Univ, Res Ctr Freshwater Aquat Prod Proc Technol Shangh, Shanghai, Peoples R China|Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Food Sci & Light Ind, Dept Food Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China|Tianshun Agr Prod Co Ltd, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号