首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >Early impacts of Communities for Children on children and families: findings from a quasi-experimental cohort study
【24h】

Early impacts of Communities for Children on children and families: findings from a quasi-experimental cohort study

机译:儿童社区对儿童和家庭的早期影响:一项准实验队列研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background There have been few evaluations of national area-based interventions. This study evaluated the early effects of Commmunities for Children (CfC) on children and their families and whether the effectiveness differed for more disadvantaged families. Methods A quasi-experimental cohort study in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in Australia. Mothers of children aged 2—3 years participated at wave 1; 1488 children in CfC communities and 714 children in comparison communities. Outcome measures included child health and development, family functioning and parenting, and services and community. Results After controlling for background factors, there were beneficial effects associated with CfC. At wave 3, in CfC areas children had higher receptive vocabulary (mean difference (MD) 0.25, 95% Cl -0.02 to 0.51; p=0.07), parents showed less harsh parenting (MD -0.14, 95% Cl -0.30 to 0.02; p=0.08) and higher parenting self-efficacy (MD 0.11, 95% Cl 0.00 to 0.21; p=0.04). Fewer children living in CfC sites were living in a jobless household (OR 0.56, 95% Cl 0.32 to 0.95; p=0.03) but children's physical functioning (MD -0.26, 95% Cl -0.53 to 0.00; p=0.05) was worse in CfC sites. For children living in households with mothers with low education there were reduced child injuries requiring medical treatment (MD -0.61, 95% Cl -0.07 to -1.13; p=0.03) and increased receptive vocabulary (MD 0.57, 95% Cl 0.06 to 1.08; p=0.03). Conclusions CfC showed some benefits for child receptive vocabulary, parenting and reducing jobless households and two adverse effects. Children living in the most disadvantaged households also benefited.
机译:背景很少有对国家区域干预措施的评估。这项研究评估了儿童社区(CfC)对儿童及其家庭的早期影响,以及其有效性是否对处境不利的家庭有所不同。方法在澳大利亚的社会经济弱势社区进行一项准实验队列研究。 2-3岁儿童的母亲参加了第一波; CfC社区中有1488名儿童,比较社区中有714名儿童。成果措施包括儿童健康与发展,家庭功能和养育子女以及服务和社区。结果在控制了背景因素之后,CfC产生了有益的影响。在第3浪中,在CfC地区,孩子的接受词汇量更高(平均差异(MD)0.25,95%Cl -0.02至0.51; p = 0.07),父母的父母养育行为较弱(MD -0.14,95%Cl -0.30至0.02) ; p = 0.08)和较高的育儿自我效能感(MD 0.11,95%Cl 0.00至0.21; p = 0.04)。居住在CfC场所的儿童较少,他们住在失业家庭中(OR 0.56,95%Cl 0.32至0.95; p = 0.03),但儿童的身体机能(MD -0.26,95%Cl -0.53至0.00; p = 0.05)较差在CfC网站中。对于生活在母亲文化程度较低的家庭中的孩子,需要医疗的儿童受伤减少了(MD -0.61,95%Cl -0.07至-1.13; p = 0.03),接受词汇量增加了(MD 0.57,95%Cl 0.06至1.08) ; p = 0.03)。结论CfC对接受儿童的词汇,养育子女和减少失业家庭显示出一些好处,并产生两个不利影响。生活在最弱势家庭中的儿童也从中受益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health》 |2011年第10期|p.909-914|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Australian Institute of Family Studies, Level 20, 485 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia;

    Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;

    Anglicare Victoria, Policy Research and Innovation Unit, Victoria, Australia;

    Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;

    Social Policy Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;

    Social Policy Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;

    Social Policy Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号