...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental law >Public Participation in Chinas EIA Regime: Rhetoric or Reality?
【24h】

Public Participation in Chinas EIA Regime: Rhetoric or Reality?

机译:公众参与中国的环境影响评估制度:修辞还是现实?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The emergence of public participation in a country without the tradition of participatory democracy deserves investigation. Based on a case study of the YuanMingYuan dispute that led to China's first public hearing on the environmental impact of a project, positive progress towards a more transparent and inclusive decision-making process is examined. While the relevant provisions of the EIA Law, the Regulation on Information Disclosure, the Provisional Measures on Public Participation and the Measures on Environmental Information Disclosure all aim to facilitate public involvement in the EIA process, there are outstanding problems that hinder effective and meaningful participation. Major constraints include the limited extent of public participation in project EIA, limited access to information, limited impact of the public in decision-making, and limited access to judicial redress and remedy. A lot more efforts are needed to eliminate these constraints in order to fully realize the benefits of public participation.
机译:在没有参与民主传统的国家中,公众参与的出现值得调查。基于导致中国首次公开听审项目环境影响的圆明园争端的案例研究,研究了朝着更加透明和包容的决策过程取得的积极进展。尽管《环境影响评价法》,《信息披露条例》,《公众参与暂行办法》和《环境信息披露办法》的有关规定均旨在促进公众参与环境影响评价过程,但仍然存在一些阻碍有效和有意义的参与的突出问题。主要制约因素包括公众参与项目环境影响评估的范围有限,获得信息的途径有限,公众对决策的影响有限以及获得司法救济和补救的途径有限。为了充分实现公众参与的利益,需要付出更多的努力来消除这些限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号