首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >The social question and fundamental principles of modern market economics - there is more agreement than contradiction The case of von Schmoller's labour question
【24h】

The social question and fundamental principles of modern market economics - there is more agreement than contradiction The case of von Schmoller's labour question

机译:现代市场经济学的社会问题和基本原理-共识多于矛盾-冯·史莫勒的劳动问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - In view of current catchwords like globalisation, internationalisation and flexible markets, it should be remembered that many of the fundamental economic positions which are assigned to those terms were already put forward by promoters of the social question. The questions discussed are whether the social question and modem market economics are related to each other - if at all - and to what extent the strategies of the social question can be helpful, may be even to the solution of present problems. Design/methodology/approach - Different issues and methods are compared which lead both the Historical School and modern economic theory to similar results. "Historical" hermeneutical and modern analytical (e.g. game theoretic) thinking are described and compared. Findings - It turns out that parts of the Historical School agree with the fundamental principles of modern market economics. It is also shown (in contrast to widely spread opinions) that von Schmoller can be considered as a great forerunner of the social market economy in many of his views. Research limitations/implications - The analysis of the social question is restricted to the example of von Schmoller's treatment of the labour question. Comparison is reduced to certain issues such as the role of productivity, free competition, bargaining. Practical implications - The comparison of different methods of analysis recommends not to thoughtlessly refusing the results of the Historical School. It makes sense to assess some of these old results in relation to the current conditions and circumstances. Originality/value - The solution to the social question is linked to the harmonious development of individual and social goals, not only based on the exchange of economic quantities but also under consideration of these relationships as an expression of ethics, custom, culture, ideas, education and public opinion - all of which are problems of the present.
机译:目的-鉴于当前流行语如全球化,国际化和灵活的市场,应该记住,分配给这些术语的许多基本经济地位已经由社会问题的发起者提出。所讨论的问题是,社会问题和现代市场经济学是否相互关联(如果有的话),以及社会问题的策略在多大程度上可以帮助解决甚至可能解决当前的问题。设计/方法/方法-比较了不同的问题和方法,这些问题和方法使历史学派和现代经济理论都得出了相似的结果。描述和比较了“历史的”解释学和现代的分析(例如博弈论)思维。发现-历史学派的某些部分符合现代市场经济学的基本原理。冯·施莫勒(von Schmoller)也被认为(与广泛传播的观点相反),在他的许多观点中都是社会市场经济的伟大先驱。研究的局限性/意义-对社会问题的分析仅限于冯·斯莫勒(von Schmoller)处理劳动问题的例子。比较仅限于某些问题,例如生产力的作用,自由竞争,讨价还价。实际意义-比较不同的分析方法建议不要轻描淡写地拒绝历史学派的结果。评估与当前状况相关的一些旧结果是有意义的。原创性/价值-解决社会问题的方法与个人和社会目标的和谐发展息息相关,不仅基于经济量的交换,而且考虑到这些关系是伦理,风俗,文化,思想,教育和舆论-所有这些都是当前的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号