首页> 外文学位 >The social question and the welfare state in the modern world-system (Great Britain, Germany, Sweden, United States).
【24h】

The social question and the welfare state in the modern world-system (Great Britain, Germany, Sweden, United States).

机译:现代世界体系(英国,德国,瑞典,美国)中的社会问题和福利国家。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation focused on the rise and current crisis of the welfare state. One condition widely believed to have been essential to the rise of the welfare state is proletarianization. This work agrees that the welfare state required the existence of a substantial proletariat separated from the ownership of the means of production as well as dependency on wages and salaries. It is not by accident that the welfare state is in large part essentially a core and semi-periphery phenomenon. Peripheral areas with a substantial reliance on subsistence production were theoretically less suitable.; Although this work shares the thesis that proletarianization has been a crucial condition, this work pointed to the historical paradox that despite its unsurpassed extent of proletarianization during the 19th century, and in addition being the driving force in generalizing the factory structure, Great Britain, the most advanced capitalist country nevertheless, failed to point the way to the modern welfare state.; An important question raised in the dissertation is why Great Britain, despite these features failed to initiate the development of the welfare state model and why it was Germany together with the Nordic countries which took the lead instead?; Welfare institutions were characteristically a feature of high income core and semiperipheral areas. As long as economic expansion increased while economic growth and employment were kept low, the welfare state had a secure place in high income areas. The economic downturn which started in the 1960s, the restructuring of industries to low income areas, and the resulting rise of unemployment affected the welfare state of the core and semi-periphery. As a result, the post-war welfare consensus weakened during the 1970s. Western democratic governments were suffering under the burden of overload.; There were generally two answers to the challenge the welfare state faced during the world-economic decline after 1967/73. On the one hand, there were those areas—e.g. Great Britain and the U.S.—where attempts were made to substantially roll-back the welfare state. Other areas—e.g. Sweden and Germany—held on to the welfare state. Great Britain not only experienced an economic crisis but also suffered from the disappearance of its hegemonic remnants. The effects of this decline were severe. Thatcherism, joined by Reaganism were the most significant core states to retreat from the trilateral coalition between business enterprise, the state, and labor. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:本文的重点是福利国家的兴起和当前的危机。人们普遍认为,对福利国家的崛起至关重要的条件之一就是无产阶级化。这项工作同意,福利国家要求存在大量的无产阶级,与生产资料的所有权以及对工资和薪水的依赖相分离。福利国家在很大程度上基本上是核心和半边缘现象,这并非偶然。从理论上讲,很大程度上依赖维持生计的外围地区不太适合。尽管这项工作有一个论点,即无产阶级化是一个至关重要的条件,但这项工作指出了一个历史悖论,尽管它在19世纪无产阶级化的程度无与伦比,而且是推动工厂结构普遍化的动力,但英国,然而,最先进的资本主义国家却没有为现代福利国家指明道路。论文中提出的一个重要问题是,尽管有这些特征,但英国为何未能启动福利国家模式的发展?为什么是德国和北欧国家一起率领了?福利机构的特点是高收入核心和半外围地区。只要经济增长增加而经济增长和就业保持在较低水平,福利国家就可以在高收入地区占有一席之地。 1960年代开始的经济衰退,产业结构向低收入地区的重组以及随之而来的失业率上升影响了核心和半外围国家的福利状况。结果,战后福利共识在1970年代减弱了。西方民主政府正承受着超负荷的苦难。对于福利国家在1967/73年后世界经济衰退期间面临的挑战,通常有两个答案。一方面,有一些领域-例如大不列颠和美国-试图大幅削减福利国家。其他领域-例如瑞典和德国-坚持福利国家制。大不列颠不仅经历了经济危机,而且霸权残余的消失也使他们遭受了痛苦。这种下降的影响是严重的。撒切尔主义和里根主义一起是最重要的核心国家,它们退出了商业企业,国家和劳工之间的三边联盟。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号