首页> 外文期刊>The journal of economic perspectives >Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm: What Have We Learned over the Past 25 Years?
【24h】

Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm: What Have We Learned over the Past 25 Years?

机译:不完整的合同和企业理论:过去25年中我们学到了什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this essay, we have focused attention on theoretical debates around the incomplete contracts/property rights approach, but we would be remiss not to add that this theory has also spurred an empirical literature on firms' boundaries and organization. For example, Grossman and Hart (1986) predict underinvestment by parties that do not have ownership (and hence residual control rights). Acemoglu, Aghion, Griffith, and Zilibotti (2010) use U.K. firm-level panel data and input-output information about U.K. firms to show that more vertically integrated firms—firms that produce a higher fraction of their inputs in-house—also display higher R&D investment by final producers and lower R&D investment by supplying industries.
机译:在本文中,我们将注意力集中在围绕不完整合同/产权方法的理论辩论上,但是我们不应该忘记,该理论还激发了关于企业边界和组织的经验文献。例如,格罗斯曼和哈特(Grossman and Hart,1986)预测,没有所有权(因此具有剩余控制权)的当事方的投资不足。 Acemoglu,Aghion,Griffith和Zilibotti(2010)使用英国公司层面的面板数据和有关英国公司的投入产出信息来表明,垂直整合程度更高的公司(企业内部产出的投入占比更高)也显示出更高的水平。最终生产商的研发投资和供应行业的研发投资降低。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The journal of economic perspectives》 |2011年第2期|p.181-197|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Harvard University,Cambridge, Massachusetts;

    University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, Illinois;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号