首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization >'Doggedness' or 'disengagement'? An experiment on the effect of inequality in endowment on behaviour in team competitions
【24h】

'Doggedness' or 'disengagement'? An experiment on the effect of inequality in endowment on behaviour in team competitions

机译:是“沉迷”还是“脱离接触”? team赋不平等对团队比赛行为影响的实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Teams often suffer from a free rider problem with respect to individual contributions. That putting teams into competition with each other can mitigate this problem is an important recent insight. However, we know little about how inequality in endowment between teams might influence this beneficial effect from competition. We address this question with an experiment where teams contribute to a public good that then determines their chances of winning a Tullock contest with another team. The boost to efforts from competition disappears when inequality is high. This is mainly because the 'rich' disengage': they make no more contribution to a public good than they would when there is no competition. There is evidence that the 'poor' respond to moderate inequality 'doggedly', by expending more effort compared to competition with equality, but this 'doggedness' disappears too when inequality is high. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在个人贡献方面,车队经常遭受搭便车问题。最近,使团队相互竞争可以缓解此问题,这一点很重要。但是,我们对团队之间end赋的不平等如何影响竞争带来的这种有利影响知之甚少。我们通过实验来解决这个问题,在实验中,团队为公共利益做出贡献,然后确定他们与另一支团队赢得Tullock竞赛的机会。当不平等程度很高时,竞争努力的动力就会消失。这主要是因为“富裕的脱离接触”:他们对公共物品的贡献不比没有竞争时多。有证据表明,“穷人”通过与平等竞争相比付出更多的努力来“顽强地”应对中等程度的不平等,但是当不平等程度很高时,这种“顽强”也就消失了。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号