首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences >Assurance of learning and accreditations in business schools: an AACSB perspective
【24h】

Assurance of learning and accreditations in business schools: an AACSB perspective

机译:商学院的学习和认证保证:AACSB的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The post-globalization epoch has placed academic institutions internationally in competitive situations where knowledgeable, effective and capable decisions have come to provide the comparative edge. Academia has turned to explicit - and even conceptualizing on tacit - knowledge management to elaborate a systematic approach to develop and sustain the intellectual capital needed to succeed, in response to the employment market demand for its products. To be able to do that, you must be able to visualize your organization as consisting of nothing but knowledge and knowledge flows. The use of web-based technologies in academic institutions for their diverse practices has been widespread in colleges and universities for several decades. These applications include surveying stakeholders, assessing classes, reporting on faculty development and assurance of learning (AoL) data to mention a few. Further advances have led to the integration of applications that not only enable the sharing of knowledge but which also support the reporting requirements necessary to obtain and retain accreditation, for example; likewise, satisfy the supply of intellectual capital to the employment marketplace. The purpose of this paper is to portray the relationship between AoL and accreditations at large in business schools, with the particular articulation of a modus operandi and relevant model that could facilitate curriculum improvement likewise. Design/methodology/approach - Observational research (or field research) is a type of correlational (i.e. non-experimental) research in which a researcher observes ongoing behavior. There are a variety of types of observational research, each of which has both strengths and weaknesses. A select set of business schools and leading accreditation agencies have been observed and reported upon in pertinence with the expected practices and modus operandi toward assuring learning. Findings - The use of web-based technologies in academic institutions for their diverse practices has been widespread in colleges and universities for several decades. These applications include surveying stakeholders, assessing classes, reporting on faculty development and AoL data to mention a few. Further advances have led to the integration of applications that not only enable the sharing of knowledge but which also support the reporting requirements necessary to obtain and retain accreditation; likewise, satisfy the supply of intellectual capital to the employment marketplace. In this paper, the author aims to portray the relationship between AoL and assessment at large with real-life examples and approaches. Research limitations/implications - Observational research types are organized by the extent to which an experimenter intrudes upon or controls the environment. Observational research is particularly prevalent in the social sciences. It is a social research technique that involves the direct observation of phenomena in their natural setting. This differentiates it from experimental research in which a quasi-artificial environment is created to control for spurious factors, and where at least one of the variables is manipulated as part of the experiment. Henceforth, other research methods may be engaged in to quantify and investigate the phenomenon of AoL vs international practices reported upon as per internal and external forces acting on business schools. Practical implications - The diversity of approaches followed by business schools and encouraged by accreditations agencies is immense and at times may be connected to the choices such schools make as to how they ought to measure the learning curves of their constituents. Herein, a practical AoL approach is transcribed, as liaised with assessment and evaluation data. Social implications - Academia has turned to explicit - and even conceptualizing on tacit - knowledge management to elaborate a systematic approach to develop and sustain the intellectual capital needed to succeed, in response to the employment market demand for its academic products and services. To be able to do that, you must be able to visualize your organization as consisting of nothing but knowledge and knowledge flows. Originality/value - This research is conceptualized upon as per the international standards and expectations from the field with an Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business framework in mind and aims to link AoL to curriculum management and through e-Assessment in a practical manner.
机译:目的-后全球化时代已将国际学术机构置于竞争激烈的境况中,在这些情况下,知识,有效和有能力的决策已提供了比较优势。学术界已经转向显式的知识管理,甚至是隐性的知识管理概念化,以开发一种系统的方法来开发和维持成功所需的智力资本,以响应其产品的就业市场需求。为了做到这一点,您必须能够将组织可视化为仅由知识和知识流组成的组织。在学术机构中基于网络的技术因其不同的实践而使用,数十年来一直在高校中广泛使用。这些应用程序包括调查利益相关者,评估课程,报告教师发展和学习保证(AoL)数据等。进一步的进步导致了应用程序的集成,这些应用程序不仅能够实现知识共享,而且还支持获得和保留认证所必需的报告要求。同样,要满足向就业市场提供知识资本的需求。本文的目的是描绘商学院中AoL与认证之间的关系,并特别阐述一种操作方法和相关模型,这些模型也可以促进课程的改进。设计/方法/方法-观察性研究(或现场研究)是一种相关性(即非实验性)研究,研究人员在其中观察正在进行的行为。观测研究有多种类型,每种都有长处和短处。观察到了一些商学院和领先的认证机构,并与预期的实践和保证学习的方式有关。研究结果-几十年来,学术机构广泛使用基于网络的技术来实现其多样化的实践。这些应用程序包括调查利益相关者,评估课程,报告教师发展和AoL数据等。进一步的进步导致了应用程序的集成,这些应用程序不仅可以实现知识共享,而且还支持获得和保留认证所必需的报告要求;同样,要满足向就业市场提供知识资本的需求。在本文中,作者旨在通过现实中的例子和方法来描绘AoL与评估之间的关系。研究的局限性/意义-观察性研究类型是根据实验者对环境的干预程度或控制程度来组织的。观察研究在社会科学中尤为普遍。这是一种社会研究技术,涉及在自然环境中直接观察现象。这与实验研究不同,在实验研究中,创建了一个准人造环境来控制杂散因子,并且其中至少一个变量作为实验的一部分被操纵。今后,可能还会采用其他研究方法来量化和调查根据作用于商学院的内部和外部力量而报道的AoL与国际惯例的现象。实际意义-商学院采用的方法多样,并受到认证机构的鼓励,而且有时可能与此类学校在选择如何衡量选民学习曲线方面的选择有关。在此,抄录了与评估和评估数据相关的实用AoL方法。社会影响-学术界已转向明确的知识管理,甚至将其默认为隐性知识管理,以制定一种系统的方法来开发和维持成功所需的智力资本,以响应就业市场对其学术产品和服务的需求。为了做到这一点,您必须能够将组织可视化为仅由知识和知识流组成的组织。原创性/价值-本研究是根据国际标准和该领域的期望进行概念化的,并牢记商学院联合会的先进框架,旨在以实用的方式将AoL与课程管理联系起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号