首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Evaluation of different analytical methods to assessfailure of passive transfer in neonatal calves
【24h】

Evaluation of different analytical methods to assessfailure of passive transfer in neonatal calves

机译:评估不同分析方法评估新生牛犊被动转移失败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate differentanalytical methods of assessing failure of passive transfer(FPT) in neonatal calves. We hypothesized that3 different media (i.e., centrifuged serum, centrifugedplasma, filtered plasma) and different analytical methods[i.e., ELISA, capillary electrophoresis (CE), Brix refractometer,and handheld optical refractometer] wouldbe highly correlated with the gold standard radial immunodiffusion(RID) and would generate comparableresults. Serum and plasma blood samples were collectedfrom Holstein Friesian calves (n = 216) aged 1 to 7 d,from 2 commercial dairy herds in northeast Germany.The RID analysis showed that 59 of 216 calves (27%)had serum IgG concentrations of <10 mg/mL and 157calves (73%) had serum concentrations of ≥10 mg/mL.The mean IgG concentration (± standard deviation)was 17.1 ± 9.8 mg/mL, and the range was 0.8 to 47.8mg/mL. In serum, the correlation between RID and CEwas r = 0.97, and between RID and ELISA was r = 0.90;CE and ELISA were also highly correlated (r = 0.89).Both refractometry methods were highly correlatedwith RID using centrifuged serum, centrifuged plasma,or filtered plasma (Brix refractometer: r = 0.84, 0.80,and 0.78, respectively; handheld optical refractometer:r = 0.83, 0.81, and 0.80, respectively). We determinedtest characteristics (optimum thresholds, sensitivity,specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictivevalue, and area under the curve) for CE, ELISA, andthe handheld optical and digital refractometers usingreceiver operating characteristic curve analyses withRID as the reference value. Optimal thresholds for assessingFPT using plasma were higher than for serum,regardless of the method of plasma harvesting. The 4different devices had comparable areas under the curve,irrespective of the medium used. All analytical methodscan be used to assess FPT.
机译:本研究的目的是评估不同的评估被动转移失败的分析方法(FPT)在新生牛犊中。我们假设这一点3种不同的介质(即,离心血清,离心等离子体,过滤等离子体)和不同的分析方法[即ELISA,毛细管电泳(CE),BRIX折射仪,和手持光学折射仪]会与金标准径向免疫分配高度相关(RID)并会产生可比性结果。收集血清和血浆血液样品从Holstein Friesian犊牛(n = 216),1至7天,从德国东北部的2个商业乳制品牛群。RID分析表明,216只小牛的59名(27%)具有<10mg / ml和157的血清IgG浓度犊牛(73%)具有≥10mg/ ml的血清浓度。平均IgG浓度(标准偏差)为17.1±9.8 mg / ml,范围为0.8至47.8mg / ml。在血清中,RID和CE之间的相关性是r = 0.97,而在RID和ELISA之间是r = 0.90;CE和ELISA也高度相关(r = 0.89)。折射动术方法都高度相关使用离心血清,离心等离子体,或过滤等离子体(Brix折射仪:r = 0.84,0.80,分别为0.78;手持光学折射仪:r = 0.83,0.81和0.80分别)。我们确定了测试特征(最佳阈值,灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测价值,消极预测CE,ELISA和曲线下的价值和区域)手持光学和数字折射计使用接收器操作特征曲线分析作为参考值。评估的最佳阈值使用血浆的FPT比血清高,无论等离子体收获方法。 4.不同的设备在曲线下具有可比区域,无论使用的培养基。所有分析方法可用于评估FPT。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2020年第6期|5387-5397|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Clinic for Animal Reproduction Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Freie Universitaet Berlin Koenigsweg 65 14163 Berlin Germany;

    Department of Veterinary Sciences Chair of Animal Welfare Ethology Animal Hygiene and Animal Husbandry Faculty of Veterinary Medicine LMU Munich Veterinaerstrasse 13 80539 Munich Germany;

    Department of Veterinary Sciences Chair of Animal Welfare Ethology Animal Hygiene and Animal Husbandry Faculty of Veterinary Medicine LMU Munich Veterinaerstrasse 13 80539 Munich Germany;

    Saskatoon Colostrum Co. Ltd. 30 Molaro Place Saskatoon SK S7K 6A2 Canada;

    Laboklin GmbH & Co. KG Laboratory for Clinical Diagnostics Steubenstrasse 4 97688 Bad Kissingen Germany;

    Clinic for Animal Reproduction Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Freie Universitaet Berlin Koenigsweg 65 14163 Berlin Germany;

    Clinic for Animal Reproduction Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Freie Universitaet Berlin Koenigsweg 65 14163 Berlin Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    capillary electrophoresis; plasma filter; failure of passive transfer; neonatal calves;

    机译:毛细管电泳;等离子体过滤器;被动转移失败;新生儿小牛;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号