...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Curriculum Studies >‘You’ve got to teach people that racism is wrong and then they won’t be racist’: Curricular representations and young people’s understandings of ‘race’ and racism
【24h】

‘You’ve got to teach people that racism is wrong and then they won’t be racist’: Curricular representations and young people’s understandings of ‘race’ and racism

机译:“您必须教会人们种族主义是错误的,然后他们才不会成为种族主义者”:课程表述和年轻人对“种族”和种族主义的理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper critically examines the discursive (mis) representation of ‘race’ and racism in the formal curriculum. Combining qualitative data derived from interviews with 35 young people who were enrolled in a Dublin-based, ethnically diverse secondary school, with a critical discursive analysis of 20 textbooks, the paper explores parallels between young people’s understandings of ‘race’ and racism and curricular representations of these constructs. It is argued that the formal education system reinforces, rather than challenges, popular theories of racism, and endorses the ideological framework of colour-blind racism by providing definitions and explanations which individualize, minimize, and naturalize racism. The analysis centres on four major inter-related themes: (1) the individualization of racism; (2) the attribution of racism to difference; (3) the role of narratives of denial and redemption in the construction of an ‘anti-racist’ state; and (4) the reification of ‘race’. The final section of the paper seeks to synthesize some of the broader political and ethical consequences and ideological effects of dominant discourses on ‘race’ and racism, and offers some concrete illustrations of how ‘race’ and racism could be re-narrativized in schools.View full textDownload full textKeywordsracism, anti-racism, discourse analysis, curriculum, youthRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.699557
机译:本文对正规课程中“种族”和种族主义的话语(错误)表示进行了严格审查。结合对来自都柏林,种族多样化的中学的35名年轻人进行访谈所得的定性数据,并对20本教科书进行了严格的话语分析,本文探讨了年轻人对“种族”的理解之间的相似之处。 ™和种族主义以及这些结构的课程表述。有人认为,正规教育制度加强而不是挑战种族主义的流行理论,并通过提供能够使种族主义个体化,最小化和自然化的定义和解释,来支持色盲种族主义的意识形态框架。分析集中在四个相互关联的主要主题上:(1)种族主义的个体化; (2)种族主义归因于差异; (3)否认和救赎叙事在构建“反种族主义”国家中的作用; (4)“种族”的具体化。本文的最后一部分力图综合讨论主流话语对“种族”和种族主义的更广泛的政治和伦理后果以及意识形态的影响,并对“种族”和种族主义如何成为可能提供了一些具体例证。查看全文下载关键词种族主义,反种族主义,话语分析,课程表,青年人相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin, facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.699557

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号