首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning >Preservice and inservice teachers' pedagogical reasoning underlying their most-valued technology-supported instructional activities
【24h】

Preservice and inservice teachers' pedagogical reasoning underlying their most-valued technology-supported instructional activities

机译:Preservice和Inservice教师的教学推理潜在的最有价值的技术支持的教学活动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract We examined teachers' pedagogical reasoning for and the technological knowledge underlying their most‐valued technology‐supported activities for teaching and learning. Data from 140 preservice and 100 inservice teachers included open‐ended, narrative responses to survey questions. Qualitative research methods guided analysis of the data that identified (a) the technology‐supported activities and (b) the technical tools, target users, types of uses, rationales for use, and the TPACK underlying each activity. Preservice teachers described mostly teacher‐focused and fewer student‐focused techno‐activities, and their reasoning for use focused on the technology's presentational and engagement effects. A majority of inservice teachers' techno‐activities were student‐focused, and their reasoning highlighted the technology's support for knowledge acquisition of higher‐order cognitive skills and collaborative learning. The knowledge underlying all teachers' techno‐activities was predominantly technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK), but inservice teachers also evidenced technological content knowledge (TCK). These results may reveal differences in the teachers' respective learning experiences in teacher education and professional development or reflect a professional maturation process in that it takes teachers time in the field as professionals to broaden their techno‐activity repertoires to prioritize student‐focus. Sharing the reasoning patterns in this study with teachers may assist them in developing deeper justifications for their technological work in the classroom.
机译:摘要我们审查了教师的教学推理,技术知识潜在的最有价值的技术支持的教学和学习活动。来自140个Preservice和100个Inservice教师的数据包括开放式叙述响应来调查问题。定性研究方法指导分析(a)技术支持的活动和(b)技术工具,目标用户,使用类型,使用的理由以及每个活动的Tpack的数据。 Preservice教师描述了专注于教师的专注和更少的学生的技术活动,以及他们的推理,专注于技术的呈现和参与效果。大多数人的服务技术活动都是专注于学生的,他们的推理强调了该技术对知识获取高阶认知技能和协作学习的支持。所有教师技术活动的知识主要是技术教学知识(TPK),但Inservice教师也明确了技术内容知识(TCK)。这些结果可能会揭示教师教育和专业发展中的教师各自的学习经验的差异,或者反映了专业成熟过程,因为它需要教师在现场作为专业人士,以扩大他们的技术活动曲目优先考虑学生焦点。与教师分享这项研究中的推理模式可以帮助他们在课堂上为其技术工作发展更深入的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号