>This “reflections” piece identifies major themes emerging from the commentaries in the issue. I discuss how some existing issues with the levels '/> Reflections on Commentaries on 'Issues in Human-Automation Interaction Modeling'
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making >Reflections on Commentaries on 'Issues in Human-Automation Interaction Modeling'
【24h】

Reflections on Commentaries on 'Issues in Human-Automation Interaction Modeling'

机译:关于“人与人互动模型问题”评论的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

>This “reflections” piece identifies major themes emerging from the commentaries in the issue. I discuss how some existing issues with the levels of automation (LOAs) approach may be further resolved as well as how different perspectives can lead to richer human-automation interaction (HAI) model development. The overarching objective here is to offer some reflections and last thoughts on the overall discussion of LOA issues, but of course, there may be some concerns on which some researchers may need to “agree to disagree.” Related to this, there are a few observations in the commentaries that I respond to with points of fact. Lastly, I suggest a set of future research directions based on several methodological recommendations by commentators as well as my own perspective on what is needed in HAI modeling to move forward.
机译: >此“反思”部分确定了本期评论中出现的主要主题。我将讨论如何进一步解决自动化水平(LOA)方法中的一些现有问题,以及不同的观点如何导致更丰富的人-自动化交互(HAI)模型开发。这里的总体目标是对LOA问题的整体讨论提供一些思考和最后的想法,但是,当然,有些研究人员可能需要“同意不同意”。与此相关的是,我在评论中以事实为根据回应了一些观察。最后,我根据评论员的一些方法学建议以及我对HAI建模向前发展所需的观点,提出了一套未来的研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号