...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists >Comparison of Factors Involved in Starch Degradation in Barley Germination Under Laboratory and Malting Conditions
【24h】

Comparison of Factors Involved in Starch Degradation in Barley Germination Under Laboratory and Malting Conditions

机译:大麦和制麦条件下大麦萌发淀粉降解相关因子的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Barley has long been the model plant for the physiological studies of starch degradation and germination. The majority of barley germination research was and is conducted using various laboratory germination methods. The extrapolation of knowledge obtained in laboratory barley germination studies to malting is commonplace but could prove problematic because of the differences between the two techniques. Grains were laboratory-germinated (LG) or micromalted (MM) and sampled daily from 0 to 5 days after imbibition/steeping. alpha-Amylase and beta-amylase activities and protein levels along with starch, osmolyte concentration (OC), and sugar (glucose, sucrose, fructose, maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose, maltopentaose, maltohexaose, and maltoheptaose) concentrations were determined. Two alpha-amylase isoforms were detected in LG and MM grains. In LG grains, an approximately 50-kDa isoform was the predominant isoform early in germination and, as germination proceeded, was degraded to an approximately 40-kDa isoform. In MM grains, the 40-kDa isoform was the predominant form, and levels increased as germination proceeded. beta-Amylase activity remained constant throughout both LG and MM treatments. However, LG grain alpha-amylase underwent more proteolytic processing than MM grain beta-amylase. Maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose, maltopentaose, maltohexaose, total sugars, and OC all accumulated one day later in LG grains. The imbibition/steeping time was the critical step in determining the accumulation patterns, and the shorter imbibition/steeping time commonly used in laboratory germination experiments appears to have caused the one-day delay in sugar and OC accumulation. However, it did not explain the protein processing differences. Thus, intrinsic differences between the LG and MM procedures that cause differences in sugar accumulation and protein processing must be accounted for when trying to extrapolate data obtained using laboratory germination procedures to malting.
机译:大麦长期以来一直是淀粉降解和萌发的生理研究的典范植物。大麦的发芽研究曾经并且正在使用各种实验室发芽方法进行。在实验室大麦发芽研究中获得的知识外推到麦芽制造是很平常的事,但由于两种技术之间的差异,可能会出现问题。谷物经过实验室发芽(LG)或微麦芽(MM),并在吸水/吸水后0至5天每天取样。确定了α-淀粉酶和β-淀粉酶的活性和蛋白质水平以及淀粉,渗透液浓度(OC)和糖(葡萄糖,蔗糖,果糖,麦芽糖,麦芽三糖,麦芽四糖,麦芽五糖,麦芽六糖和麦芽七糖)的浓度。在LG和MM颗粒中检测到两个α-淀粉酶同工型。在LG谷物中,大约50 kDa的同工型是发芽初期的主要同工型,随着发芽的进行,其降解为大约40 kDa的同工型。在MM谷物中,40-kDa的同工型是主要形式,其水平随着发芽的进行而增加。在LG和MM处理过程中,β-淀粉酶活性均保持恒定。但是,LG谷物的α-淀粉酶比MM谷物的β-淀粉酶进行了更多的蛋白水解处理。麦芽糖,麦芽三糖,麦芽四糖,麦芽五糖,麦芽六糖,总糖和OC均在一天后在LG谷物中积累。吸/吸时间是确定累积模式的关键步骤,实验室发芽实验中通常使用的较短的吸/吸时间似乎导致糖和OC累积延迟一天。但是,它没有解释蛋白质加工的差异。因此,当尝试将使用实验室发芽程序获得的数据外推至制麦芽时,必须考虑LG和MM程序之间导致糖积累和蛋白质加工差异的内在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号