【24h】

Education for Change

机译:变革教育

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The author uses two publications, Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe (Alesina and Glaeser) and Poetry magazine, to underscore the important role that educational institutions play in developing a person’s political philosophy and imagination. European nations, for instance, have better funded social welfare programs than the US because their system of public education incorporates more liberal or left-leaning teachings into their standard curricula. The author sees implications for a more intentional approach to education in the US for those who are interested in changing the food system. If American educational institutions viewed their role as producing food competent citizens, he argues, then we would be more successful in addressing obesity, promoting a more sustainable food system, and even reducing poverty. Food system activists, dieticians and nutritionists, parents, and elected officials should take a more aggressive position with educational institutions to develop programs, services, and curricula capable of achieving these ends.
机译:作者使用两篇出版物,《美国和欧洲的抗击贫困》(Alesina and Glaeser)和《诗歌》杂志,强调教育机构在发展人的政治哲学和想象力方面的重要作用。例如,欧洲国家比美国拥有更好的社会福利计划资金,因为它们的公共教育体系将更多的自由主义或左倾教义纳入其标准课程。作者认为,对于那些有兴趣改变食品体系的人来说,在美国采用一种更有针对性的教育方法具有重要意义。他认为,如果美国的教育机构将他们的角色看作是培养有食物能力的公民,那么我们将在解决肥胖症,促进更可持续的粮食体系甚至减少贫困方面取得更大的成功。食品系统活动家,营养学家和营养学家,父母以及民选官员应在教育机构中采取更具进取心的立场,以开发能够实现这些目标的计划,服务和课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号