首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics >Building a Sustainable Future for Animal Agriculture: An Environmental Virtue Ethic of Care Approach within the Philosophy of Technology
【24h】

Building a Sustainable Future for Animal Agriculture: An Environmental Virtue Ethic of Care Approach within the Philosophy of Technology

机译:建立动物农业的可持续未来:技术哲学内的环境美德伦理护理方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Agricultural technologies are non-neutral and ethical challenges are posed by these technologies themselves. The technologies we use or endorse are embedded with values and norms and reflect the shape of our moral character. They can literally make us better or worse consumers and/or people. Looking back, when the world’s developed nations welcomed and steadily embraced industrialization as the dominant paradigm for agriculture a half century or so ago, they inadvertently championed a philosophy of technology that promotes an insular human-centricism, despite its laudable intent to ensure food security and advance human flourishing. The dominant philosophy of technology has also seeded particular ethical consequences that plague the well-being of human beings, the planet, and farmed animals. After revisiting some fundamental questions regarding the complex ways in which technology as agent shapes our lives and choices and relegates food and farmed constituents into technological artifacts or commodities, I argue that we should accord an environmental virtue ethic of care—understood as caretaking—a central place in developing a more conscientious philosophy of technology that aims at sustainability, fairness, and humaneness in animal agriculture. While technology shapes society, it also is socially shaped and an environmental virtue ethic of care (EVEC) as an alternative design philosophy has the tools to help us take a much overdue inventory of ourselves and our relationships with the nonhuman world. It can help us to expose the ways in which technology hinders critical reflection of its capacity to alter communities and values, to come to terms with why we may be, in general, disengaged from critical ethical analysis of contemporary agriculture and to consider the moral shape and trajectory and the sustainability of our food production systems going into the future. I end by outlining particular virtues associated with the ethic of care discussed here and consider some likely implications for consumers and industry technocrats as they relate to farming animals.
机译:农业技术是非中立的,这些技术本身也构成了道德挑战。我们使用或认可的技术嵌入了价值观和规范,并反映了我们道德品格的形状。从字面上看,它们可以使我们变得更好或更糟的消费者和/或人民。回顾过去,半个多世纪以来,当世界发达国家欢迎并稳步接受工业化作为农业的主要范式时,他们无意间倡导了促进以人为本的以人为本的技术哲学,尽管其旨在确保粮食安全和促进粮食安全的可口可乐。促进人类的繁荣。占主导地位的技术哲学还产生了特殊的伦理后果,这些后果困扰着人类,地球和农场动物的福祉。在重新审视了有关技术作为媒介塑造我们的生活和选择并将食物和农业成分降级为技术人工制品或商品的复杂方式的一些基本问题之后,我认为我们应该将环境美德伦理(即被理解为“照顾”)赋予中心致力于发展更加认真的技术哲学,旨在实现动物农业的可持续性,公平性和人性化。技术在塑造社会的同时,也塑造了社会,并且作为替代设计理念的环境美德伦理(EVEC)具有工具,可以帮助我们对自己以及与非人类世界的关系进行应有的评估。它可以帮助我们揭示技术阻碍其对改变社区和价值观的能力进行批判性反映的方式,以解决我们通常可能脱离当代农业的批判性伦理分析并考虑道德形态的原因。以及未来粮食生产系统的轨迹和可持续性。最后,我概述了此处讨论的与护理伦理相关的特殊优点,并考虑了与养殖动物有关的对消费者和行业技术专家的可能影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号