...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Advanced Transportation >Optimization of headways with stop-skipping control: a case study of bus rapid transit system
【24h】

Optimization of headways with stop-skipping control: a case study of bus rapid transit system

机译:带有停步控制的车道优化:以公交快速运输系统为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bus rapid transit system is designed to provide high-quality and cost-efficient passenger transportation services. In order to achieve this design objective, effective scheduling strategies are required. This research aims at improving the operation efficiency and service quality of a BRT system through integrated optimization of its service headways and stop-skipping strategy. Based on cost analysis for both passengers and operation agencies, an optimization model is established. A genetic algorithms based algorithm and an application-oriented solution method are developed. Beijing BRT Line 2 has been chosen as a case study, and the effectiveness of the optimal headways with stop-skipping services under different demand levels has been analyzed. The results has shown that, at a certain demand level, the proposed operating strategy can be most advantageous for passengers with an accepted increase of operating costs, under which the optimum headway is between 3.5 and 5.5min for stop-skipping services during the morning peak hour depending on the demand with the provision of stop-skipping services. The effectiveness of the optimal headways with stop-skipping services is compared with those of existing headways and optimal headways without stop-skipping services. The results show that operating strategies under the optimal headways with stop-skipping services outperforms the other two operating strategies with respect to total costs and in-vehicle time for passengers. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:公交快速运输系统旨在提供高质量和具有成本效益的客运服务。为了实现该设计目标,需要有效的调度策略。本研究旨在通过对BRT系统的服务行程和停站策略进行综合优化来提高BRT系统的运营效率和服务质量。基于对乘客和运营机构的成本分析,建立了优化模型。开发了基于遗传算法的算法和面向应用的求解方法。选择北京BRT 2号线作为案例研究,并分析了在不同需求水平下带停步服务的最佳车道的有效性。结果表明,在一定的需求水平下,建议的运营策略对运营成本的增加最为有利,因为在早上高峰期,中途停站服务的最佳时距在3.5至5.5分钟之间小时,视需求提供跳停服务。将具有停靠服务的最佳车道的有效性与现有停靠路和没有停靠服务的最佳车道的有效性进行比较。结果表明,就总费用和乘客的乘车时间而言,在具有最佳延车服务的情况下,具有最佳延误服务的运营策略要优于其他两种运营策略。版权所有(c)2014 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Advanced Transportation》 |2015年第3期|385-401|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Ctr Cooperat Innovat Beijing Metropolitan Transpo, MOE Key Lab Transportat Complex Syst Theory & Tec, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China;

    Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada;

    Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat, MOE Key Lab Transportat Complex Syst Theory & Tec, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China;

    Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    bus rapid transit; stop-skipping; optimization; cost; headway;

    机译:公交快速运输;停站;优化;成本;行驶距离;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号