首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Advanced Transportation >Decision-Support Framework for Selecting the Optimal Road Toll Collection System
【24h】

Decision-Support Framework for Selecting the Optimal Road Toll Collection System

机译:选择最佳道路收费系统的决策支持框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the central decision-making questions in planning road tolling is the selection of the optimal toll collection system (TCS). The question of TCS selection arises in the situation when the existing TCS is to be upgraded or when TCS is selected for a newly constructed road. Considering that there are multiple TCS available nowadays, with their particular advantages and disadvantages, and that there is a range of often conflicting criteria for TCS selection, this decision-making issue belongs to the group of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. The MCDM-based methodology used in this research integrates Strengths-Weakness-Opportunities-Threat (SWOT) analysis and Fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (F-PROMETHEE). The expert-based decision-support framework includes a procedure for defining evaluation criteria and their weights, scoring of alternatives, and sensitivity analysis. Presented decision-support framework is tested with fourteen toll systems. Results indicate that the best-ranked TCS is the dedicated short-range communication multilane free flow. Decision-support framework is developed for transferability to different contexts, where local features can be taken into account by choosing specific alternatives, criteria, and criteria values. Finally, this development opens up opportunities for further analysis of criteria values and considerations of user attitudes in road pricing scheme planning.
机译:规划道路收费的主要决策问题之一是最佳收费系统的选择。在要升级现有TCS或为新建道路选择TCS的情况下,会出现TCS选择的问题。考虑到当今有多种可用的TCS,它们具有各自的优缺点,并且在选择TCS时存在一系列经常相互冲突的标准,因此这一决策问题属于多标准决策(MCDM)问题。本研究中使用的基于MCDM的方法集成了优势-劣势-机会-威胁(SWOT)分析和用于富集评估的模糊偏好排序组织方法(F-PROMETHEE)。基于专家的决策支持框架包括定义评估标准及其权重,备选方案评分和敏感性分析的程序。提出的决策支持框架已通过14个收费系统进行了测试。结果表明,排名最高的TCS是专用的短距离通信多通道自由流。开发了决策支持框架,以实现向不同上下文的可转移性,可以通过选择特定的替代方案,标准和标准值来考虑本地特征。最后,这一进展为进一步分析标准价值和道路定价方案规划中用户态度的考虑提供了机会。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Advanced Transportation》 |2018年第3期|4949565.1-4949565.16|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Belgrade, Fac Transport & Traff Engn, V Stepe 305, Belgrade 11000, Serbia;

    Univ Belgrade, Fac Transport & Traff Engn, V Stepe 305, Belgrade 11000, Serbia;

    Aalto Univ, Dept Built Environm, Otakaari 4, Espoo 02150, Finland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:11:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号