...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting and public policy >The impact of PCAOB regulatory actions and engagement risk on auditors' internal audit reliance decisions
【24h】

The impact of PCAOB regulatory actions and engagement risk on auditors' internal audit reliance decisions

机译:PCAOB监管措施和参与风险对审计师内部审计依赖决策的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines how two Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) regulatory actions (the risk-based audit approach required by auditing standards and a change in the focus of the PCAOB inspection process) interact with engagement risk to affect external auditors' decisions to rely on the internal audit function (IAF). We predicted that when the focus of the PCAOB inspection process is based on effectiveness, there would be no difference in the external auditors' planned reliance on the IAF (sensitivity to the risks of the tests) across the two levels of engagement risk and when the focus of the PCAOB inspection process is balanced (meaning both an effective and a efficiency focus), the external auditors' planned reliance will be higher in the low engagement risk condition compared to the high engagement risk condition. Contrary to our prediction, we find that when the focus of the PCAOB inspection process is balanced, auditors' reliance on the IAF is not impacted by engagement risk. However, when the PCAOB inspection process is focused on effectiveness, the auditors rely more on the IAF when engagement risk is low than when it is high. Thus, if the goal of Auditing Standard No. 5 (AS5) is to have external auditors be more sensitive to the risk of the tests to be performed, then the PCAOB's efficiency focus for inspections did not have the intended effect. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文研究了两种上市公司会计监督委员会(PCAOB)的监管措施(审计标准要求的基于风险的审计方法以及PCAOB检查过程重点的改变)如何与参与风险相互作用,从而影响外部审计师的依赖决策内部审计职能(IAF)。我们预测,当PCAOB检查过程的重点是基于有效性时,在两个参与风险级别中,以及当PCAOB检查过程的重点是平衡的(意味着既注重有效又注重效率),与高参与风险条件相比,在低参与风险条件下,外部审计师的计划依赖性将更高。与我们的预测相反,我们发现当平衡PCAOB检查过程的重点时,审计师对IAF的依赖不会受到参与风险的影响。但是,当PCAOB检查过程的重点是有效性时,审计师在聘用风险低时会比在IAF高时更多地依赖IAF。因此,如果第5号审核标准(AS5)的目标是使外部审核员对要执行的测试的风险更为敏感,则PCAOB的检查效率重点不会达到预期的效果。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号