...
首页> 外文期刊>European transactions on electrical power engineering >A comparative dynamic analysis between model predictive torque control and field-oriented torque control of IM drives for electric vehicles
【24h】

A comparative dynamic analysis between model predictive torque control and field-oriented torque control of IM drives for electric vehicles

机译:电动车辆电动机电驱动器模型预测扭矩控制与现场取向扭矩控制的比较动态分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article compares two torque control methodologies, model predictive control (MPC), and field-oriented control (FOC), for induction motor (IM) control over a wide speed range applied to an electric vehicle driving system (EVDS). The control technologies are designed and developed to control torque to achieve targeted traction according to vehicle specifications and the demands of the driver. For both control techniques, the specified electric vehicle (EV) is driven under and above base speed with stator flux control and field weakening control of the IM, respectively. In EVDS, the dynamic modeling of the power plants, that is, vehicle dynamics, Li-ion battery, IM, and road forces, is considered. The dynamic behavior of the EVDS of a four-passenger city EV is analyzed and evaluated with urban dynamometer driving schedule (UDDS) driving cycle. From simulations and performance appraisal, the comparison between FOC and MPC is investigated.
机译:本文比较了两个扭矩控制方法,模型预测控制(MPC)和面向现场控制(FOC),用于在应用于电动车辆驱动系统(EVDS)上的宽速度范围内的感应电动机(IM)控制。 设计和开发控制技术以控制扭矩以根据车辆规格和驾驶员的要求实现目标牵引力。 对于两个控制技术,指定的电动车辆(EV)分别以高于基准速度驱动,分别具有IM的定子磁通控制和现场弱化控制。 在EVDS中,考虑了发电厂的动态建模,即车辆动力学,锂离子电池,IM和公路力。 通过城市测力计驾驶时间表(UDDS)驾驶周期分析和评估了四乘客城EV的EVDS的动态行为。 从模拟和性能评估中,研究了Foc和MPC之间的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号