首页> 外文期刊>International journal of systematic theology >The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy
【24h】

The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy

机译:小提琴:教义争议的历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As A. Edward Siecienski notes in the opening pages of the preface, Jaroslav Pelikan once speculated that, if there was a special circle in Dante's Inferno reserved for historical theologians, the homework assigned to them might be a thorough study of all treatises ever devoted to the question of whether the Spirit proceeds from the Father alone or from the Father and the Son. And yet, it is just such a task Siecienski sets for himself in this book. Over the past eleven hundred years, dialogue between East and West regarding the filioque has been contentious, and only in the last few decades has progress been made toward consensus. Nevertheless, the filioque continues to be a theological wedge that divides Eastern and Western Christianity, and Siecienski contends that unity on this issue can only occur once a full and honest account of the disagreement has been provided, an account that carefully examines the history of the doctrinal controversy without prejudicing one side or the other. His study is intended to be such an account.
机译:正如A. Edward Siecienski在序言的开篇中所指出的那样,Jaroslav Pelikan曾经推测,如果但丁的地狱中有一个专门的圈供历史神学家使用,分配给他们的作业可能是对所有专门研究过的论文的透彻研究。是圣灵是从父那里来还是从父子那里来的问题。然而,Siecienski在本书中为此设定了自己的任务。在过去的一千一百年中,东西方之间关于fi族的对话一直存在争议,直到最近几十年,在达成共识方面才取得进展。尽管如此,小提琴主义仍然是分裂东方和西方基督教的神学楔子,谢辛斯基认为,只有在提供了关于分歧的完整而诚实的陈述之后,才能在这个问题上实现统一,这个陈述仔细地考察了历史的分歧。在不损害一方或另一方的前提下进行理论争议。他的研究旨在说明这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号