首页> 外文期刊>nternational Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics >Container hub port competition and cooperation in Northeast Asia
【24h】

Container hub port competition and cooperation in Northeast Asia

机译:东北亚集装箱枢纽港口竞争与合作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In response to the fierce competition in the market of container cargo transportation, strategic alliances between port operators are common in the maritime industry. This paper develops a two-stage oligopoly model that comprises shippers, shipping lines and three ports (Shanghai, Ningbo and Busan Ports) located in Northeast Asia. We compare the optimal results of three strategies (independent, alliance and monopoly) and find that the alliance of Shanghai and Ningbo Ports is not only the best strategy for social welfare but also in the interest of coalition members. In addition, although the best payoff for ports is achieved under the monopoly strategy, social welfare is reduced. It means there is a misalignment between social and ports' incentives under monopoly strategy. Furthermore, the number of shipping lines will not affect the ports' preference of forming coalition.
机译:为了应对集装箱货运市场的激烈竞争,港口运营商之间的战略联盟在海运行业中很普遍。本文建立了一个两阶段的寡头垄断模型,该模型包括托运人,航运公司和位于东北亚的三个港口(上海,宁波和釜山港口)。我们比较了三种策略(独立,联盟和垄断)的最佳结果,发现上海港和宁波港的联盟不仅是社会福利的最佳策略,而且也有利于联盟成员的利益。此外,尽管在垄断战略下实现了港口的最佳回报,但社会福利却减少了。这意味着在垄断策略下,社会激励与港口激励之间存在失调。此外,航运公司的数量不会影响港口组建联盟的意愿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号