首页> 外文期刊>International journal of risk assessment and management >Life Quality Index - an empirical or a normative concept?
【24h】

Life Quality Index - an empirical or a normative concept?

机译:生活质量指数-是经验还是规范概念?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The LQI by Nathwani et al. (1997) is a social indicator that kept constant allocates a part of a country's GDP to life saving initiatives. Is the LQI built on empirical evidence of a social behaviour that implies a desired balance between free time and work time? It is shown herein that a time balancing principle leads to an explicit mathematical formula connecting work time and value productivity. Comparisons of the formula with available OECD-data show that it fits well to the data for several countries. However, it is argued that the necessary inclusion of the expected life in the LQI definition is beyond empirical verification. Thus the LQI invariance principle is claimed to be a chosen, though reasonable, normative rule of ethical resource allocation. Discrepancies between the logics of the derivations of existing variants of the LQI are mostly epistemological in nature and of less importance for the applications.
机译:Nathwani等人的LQI。 (1997年)是一个保持不变的社会指标,它将一国GDP的一部分分配给救生计划。 LQI是否建立在社会行为的经验证据基础上,这暗示着空闲时间与工作时间之间存在理想的平衡?在此示出,时间平衡原理导致连接工作时间和价值生产率的显式数学公式。该公式与经合组织数据的比较表明,该公式非常适合几个国家的数据。但是,有人认为将预期寿命包括在LQI定义中已超出了经验验证。因此,LQI不变性原则被认为是道德资源分配的一种选择的,虽然合理的规范规则。 LQI的现有变体推导的逻辑之间的差异本质上主要是认识论的,对应用而言重要性较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号