...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >Empirical research in medical ethics: How conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice
【24h】

Empirical research in medical ethics: How conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice

机译:医学伦理学中的实证研究:规范-实证合作的概念解释如何改善研究实践

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The methodology of medical ethics during the last few decades has shifted from a predominant use of normative-philosophical analyses to an increasing involvement of empirical methods. The articles which have been published in the course of this so-called 'empirical turn' can be divided into conceptual accounts of empirical-normative collaboration and studies which use socio-empirical methods to investigate ethically relevant issues in concrete social contexts. Discussion A considered reference to normative research questions can be expected from good quality empirical research in medical ethics. However, a significant proportion of empirical studies currently published in medical ethics lacks such linkage between the empirical research and the normative analysis. In the first part of this paper, we will outline two typical shortcomings of empirical studies in medical ethics with regard to a link between normative questions and empirical data: (1) The complete lack of normative analysis, and (2) cryptonormativity and a missing account with regard to the relationship between 'is' and 'ought' statements. Subsequently, two selected concepts of empirical-normative collaboration will be presented and how these concepts may contribute to improve the linkage between normative and empirical aspects of empirical research in medical ethics will be demonstrated. Based on our analysis, as well as our own practical experience with empirical research in medical ethics, we conclude with a sketch of concrete suggestions for the conduct of empirical research in medical ethics. Summary High quality empirical research in medical ethics is in need of a considered reference to normative analysis. In this paper, we demonstrate how conceptual approaches of empirical-normative collaboration can enhance empirical research in medical ethics with regard to the link between empirical research and normative analysis.
机译:背景技术在过去的几十年中,医学伦理学的方法学已从主要使用规范哲学分析转变为越来越多地采用经验方法。在所谓的“经验转向”过程中发表的文章可以分为经验-规范合作的概念说明和使用社会经验方法研究具体社会环境中与道德相关的问题的研究。讨论可以从高质量的医学伦理学经验研究中获得对规范性研究问题的深思熟虑的参考。但是,当前在医学伦理学中发表的大量实证研究缺乏实证研究与规范分析之间的这种联系。在本文的第一部分中,我们将就规范性问题与实证数据之间的联系概述医学伦理学中实证研究的两个典型缺陷:(1)完全缺乏规范性分析,(2)加密规范性和缺失关于“是”和“应该”陈述之间的关系。随后,将介绍两个选定的经验-规范合作概念,并将论证这些概念如何有助于改善医学伦理学经验研究的规范和经验方面之间的联系。根据我们的分析以及我们自己在医学伦理学经验研究中的实践经验,我们总结出了进行医学伦理学经验研究的具体建议。小结高质量的医学伦理学实证研究需要对规范分析进行认真的参考。在本文中,我们展示了经验-规范合作的概念方法如何在实证研究与规范分析之间的联系方面增强医学伦理的实证研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号