...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Production Research >Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions
【24h】

Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions

机译:解决具有中断的动态置换流水车间环境中的多目标重新计划问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In multi-objective optimisation problems, optimal decisions need to be made in the presence of trade-offs among conflicting objectives which may sometimes be expressed in different units of measure. This makes it difficult to reduce the problem to a single-objective optimisation. Furthermore, when disruptive changes emerge in manufacturing environments, such as the arrival of new jobs or machine breakdowns, the scheduling system should be adapted by responding quickly. In this paper, we propose a rescheduling architecture for solving the problem based on a predictive-reactive strategy and a new method to calculate the reactive schedule in each rescheduling period. Additionally, we developed a methodology that allows the use of multi-objective performance metrics to evaluate dispatching rules. These rules are applied at a benchmark specifically designed for this paper considering three objective functions: makespan, total weighted tardiness and stability. Three types of disruptions are also considered: arrivals of new jobs, machine breakdowns and variations in job processing times. Results showed that the RANDOM rule provides a better behaviour compared to other evaluated rules and a lower ratio of non-dominated solutions compared to ATC (apparent tardiness cost) and FIFO (first-in-first-out) rules. Moreover, the behaviour of the hypervolume metric depends on the problem dimensions.
机译:在多目标优化问题中,需要在相互矛盾的目标之间权衡取舍的情况下做出最佳决策,而这些目标有时可能以不同的度量单位表示。这使得很难将问题简化为单目标优化。此外,当制造环境中出现破坏性变化时,例如新工作的到来或机器故障,应通过快速响应来调整计划系统。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于预测-反应策略的重新调度架构,以解决该问题,并提出了一种在每个重新调度周期内计算无功调度的新方法。此外,我们开发了一种方法,该方法允许使用多目标性能指标来评估调度规则。这些规则适用于针对本文而专门设计的基准,其中考虑了三个目标函数:制造期,总加权迟滞性和稳定性。还考虑了三种类型的中断:新作业的到来,机器故障以及作业处理时间的变化。结果表明,与其他评估规则相比,RANDOM规则具有更好的行为,与ATC(表观迟滞成本)和FIFO(先进先出)规则相比,RANDOM规则具有更低的非支配解决方案比率。此外,超量度指标的行为取决于问题的维度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号