首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Human Resource Management >Using the Harvard HRM model to conceptualise the impact of changes to supervision upon HRM outcomes for different types of Australian public sector employees
【24h】

Using the Harvard HRM model to conceptualise the impact of changes to supervision upon HRM outcomes for different types of Australian public sector employees

机译:使用哈佛的人力资源管理模型来概念化地了解不同类型的澳大利亚公共部门雇员的监督变更对人力资源管理成果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Within the Australian context of a shortage of skilled professionals, this article uses the Harvard model of human resources management (HRM) to conceptualise how changes in stakeholder interests coupled with changes to situational factors affect public sector HRM policy choices that in turn affect HRM outcomes for different types of public sector employees. The findings obtained using path analysis suggest that the proposed model explained almost 50% for nurses and less than 14% for police officers. In the case of nurses, the strong significant relationship between HRM inputs and outputs may provide a further plausible explanation for one of the long-term consequences of new public management - namely, the inability to retain skilled employees (especially those in the health sector) across numerous OECD countries. The implication of these findings is that the present public sector HRM policy choice should be re-examined because of its impact on HRM outcomes. Moreover, public sector employees should not be regarded as one uniform group that responds alike to the same policy. Whilst the merits of pursuing a strong auditing focus may have benefited organisations financially, the benefits can only remain if public sector employees, including professionals, are prepared to work under those conditions. The inability to retain nurses in numerous countries, coupled with past studies that have identified (poor) management as a contributing factor, suggests that past HRM policy choices may have to be replaced by new HRM policy choices that focus on employees' perceptions of well-being. However, more studies using different types of professionals are required to confirm the generalisability of these findings.View full textDownload full textKeywordsaffective commitment, employee's perception of well-being, Harvard model of HRM, HRM, professional employees, supervision practicesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.543633
机译:在澳大利亚缺乏熟练专业人员的情况下,本文使用哈佛大学人力资源管理模型(HRM)来概念化利益相关者利益的变化以及情境因素的变化如何影响公共部门的人力资源管理政策选择,进而影响人力资源管理的成果不同类型的公共部门员工。使用路径分析获得的结果表明,该提议的模型对护士的解释率接近50%,对警察的解释率不足14%。对于护士而言,人力资源管理投入与产出之间的密切关系可能为新公共管理的长期后果之一,即无法留住熟练员工(尤其是卫生部门的雇员)提供进一步的合理解释。在许多经合组织国家中这些发现的含义是,由于当前的公共部门人力资源管理政策选择对人力资源管理成果有影响,因此应重新审查。此外,不应将公共部门雇员视为对同一政策做出相似反应的统一小组。尽管追求强有力的审计重点的优点可能使组织在财务上受益,但只有包括专业人员在内的公共部门员工准备在这些条件下工作,这些好处才能保留。由于无法在许多国家/地区聘用护士,加上过去的研究已将(差)管理视为一个重要因素,这表明过去的人力资源管理政策选择可能必须由专注于员工对健康的看法的新的人力资源管理政策选择所取代。存在。但是,需要更多使用不同类型专业人士的研究来确认这些发现的一般性。查看全文下载全文关键词的承诺,员工的幸福感,HRM的哈佛模型,HRM,专业员工,监督做法相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand :“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.543633

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利