首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Forensic Mental Health >Institutional Aggression as a Predictor of Violent Recidivism: Implications for Parole Decision Making
【24h】

Institutional Aggression as a Predictor of Violent Recidivism: Implications for Parole Decision Making

机译:机构侵略作为暴力累犯的预测指标:对假释决策的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Assessing risk for future violence in incarcerated offenders is a complex task, one which members of parole boards routinely undertake when they consider the suitability of an offender for release. Among the factors shown to influence parole board decision making is institutional aggression. However, several factors complicate the use of institutional aggression as a proxy for violent behavior following release. This includes environmental influences that may promote or suppress aggression during incarceration, and the process of adaptation to imprisonment that is characteristic of those who are imprisoned for extended periods. Furthermore, the extant research exploring the link between institutional aggression and post-release recidivism has produced varied results. This literature review examines the factors shown to impact on parole release decisions, how the decision-making process has evolved over time, and the use of violence risk assessment approaches to this task. The link between aggressive behavior in custody and aggression within the community is explored, along with the implications this holds for parole decision making and violence risk assessment in incarcerated offenders. The emergent Offence Paralleling Behaviour framework is introduced here as a method that may support the risk assessment process and guide the identification and monitoring of relevant violence risk-related behavior in custody.View full textDownload full textKeywordsrisk assessment, parole, offence paralleling behavior, violenceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.550984
机译:评估被监禁罪犯未来暴力的风险是一项复杂的任务,假释委员会的成员在考虑罪犯是否适合释放时通常会执行此任务。显示出影响假释委员会决策的因素之一是机构侵略。但是,有几个因素使机构侵略作为释放后暴力行为的替代手段变得复杂。这包括可能会在监禁期间促进或抑制侵略的环境影响,以及适应长期监禁者所特有的适应监禁的过程。此外,现有的探索制度性侵害与释放后再犯之间关系的研究产生了多种结果。这篇文献综述考察了影响假释释放决定的因素,决策过程随着时间的发展以及使用暴力风险评估方法来完成此任务的因素。探索了在社区内监护中的侵略行为与侵略之间的联系,以及这对假释决策和对被监禁犯人的暴力风险评估的影响。此处介绍了紧急犯罪并行行为框架,该方法可支持风险评估过程并指导对羁押中与暴力行为有关的相关行为的识别和监视。查看全文下载全文关键字风险评估,假释,平行犯罪行为,暴力相关变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.550984

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号