首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy >EU banking regulation on capital and liquidity ten years after the crisis: the Slovenian perspective
【24h】

EU banking regulation on capital and liquidity ten years after the crisis: the Slovenian perspective

机译:欧盟银行监管资本和流动资金危机后十年:斯洛文尼亚人的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper is about the EU banking regulation, which was an important factor in many EU countries contributing to the 2007/2008 financial crisis. Its purpose and value added is to present regulatory weaknesses most relevant for Slovenia. Most notably regarding the absence of rules limiting short-term borrowing on wholesale markets, and procyclical accounting rules which impacted capital adequacy. In the last ten years, the EU banking regulation has been subject to extensive modification. We find the introduction of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) was an important improvement. However, the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) which was designed to address borrowing on wholesale markets is not yet legally binding. Both ratios have a drawback that they may be subject to a cliff effect. Accounting rules were amended with the new accounting standard IFRS 9, but we find that the problem of procyclicality remained.
机译:本文涉及欧盟银行监管,这是许多欧盟各国有助于2007/2008金融危机的重要因素。其目的和增值是为斯洛文尼亚呈现最相关的监管弱点。最知名的是,关于没有规则限制批发市场的短期借款,以及影响资本充足率的上诉会计规则。在过去的十年中,欧盟银行监管一直受到广泛修改。我们发现引入流动性覆盖率(LCR)是一个重要的改进。但是,旨在解决批发市场借款的净稳定资金比(NSFR)尚未具有法律约束力。两种比率都有一个缺点,即它们可能受到悬崖效应。在新的会计标准IFRS 9上修订会计规则,但我们发现Procyclicality的问题仍然存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号