...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Consumer Studies >Religion's influence on consumer response to moral vs. justice message appeals
【24h】

Religion's influence on consumer response to moral vs. justice message appeals

机译:宗教对消费者对道德诉诸正义信息诉求的反应的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Building from past research on religion and self-construal, this research is the first known research to explore the relationships among religion (Western vs. Eastern vs. nonreligious), moral vs. justice message appeals, and ethical consumption. In two studies utilizing the context of Fair Trade products, we show differences in the effectiveness of moral and justice message appeals to encourage ethical consumption based on one's religious or nonreligious affiliation. Study 1 uses an Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) sample of 197 adults, finding through MANOVAs that moral (justice) appeals are the most effective at increasing purchase intentions for ethical goods among Western (nonreligious) consumers. Study 2 extends these questions to Western and Eastern religious consumers using a Qualtrics panel sample of 279 adults, finding through MANOVAs that moral (justice) appeals are more effective for Western (Eastern) religious consumers. Equally important, Study 2 results show that these effects occur regardless of religiosity level, emphasizing the need to understand consumers' religious affiliation more so than religiosity level. Results from both studies also show that change efficacy positively influences Fair Trade purchase intentions which, surprisingly, encourages ethical disengagement. Results also examine the purchase motives of customers, finding nonreligious and Eastern religious consumers to be motivated by concern for others, while Western religious consumers are motivated out of concern for self. In sum, marketing practitioners desiring to encourage ethical consumption should use self-based moral appeals (e.g., "do this because it is the right thing to do for yourself") when targeting Western religious consumers or countries with predominantly Western religious followers, while using others-based justice appeals (e.g., "do this because it is the fair thing to do for others") when targeting Eastern or nonreligious consumers or countries mostly representing these affiliates.
机译:基于过去关于宗教和自我建构的研究,该研究是探索宗教(西方与东方与非宗教),道德与正义的信息诉求以及道德消费之间的关系的第一项已知研究。在两项利用公平贸易产品的情况下进行的研究中,我们显示了道德和正义信息呼吁在鼓励基于一个人的宗教或非宗教信仰的道德消费上的有效性差异。研究1使用亚马逊的197位成年人的机械土耳其人(MTurk)样本,通过MANOVAs发现,道德(正义)诉求对于增加西方(非宗教)消费者购买道德商品的意图最有效。研究2使用Qualtrics小组对279名成年人的抽样,将这些问题扩展到了西方和东方的宗教消费者,通过MANOVAs发现道德(正义)诉求对西方(东方)宗教消费者更有效。同样重要的是,研究2的结果表明,无论宗教信仰级别如何,这些影响都会发生,强调需要比宗教信仰级别更了解消费者的宗教信仰。两项研究的结果还表明,变更效力对公平贸易购买意图产生积极影响,这令人惊讶地鼓励了道德上的脱离接触。结果还检查了顾客的购买动机,发现非宗教和东方宗教消费者是出于对他人关注的动机,而西方宗教消费者是出于对自身的关注而动机。总而言之,希望鼓励道德消费的营销从业人员在针对西方宗教消费者或主要是西方宗教追随者的国家/地区时,应使用基于自我的道德诉求(例如,“这样做是因为这是为自己做的事”),在针对东方或非宗教消费者或主要代表这些会员的国家/地区时,使用基于他人的司法诉求(例如,“这样做是因为对他人来说是件公平的事”)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号