...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Rethinking The Boundaries Of Democratic Secession: Liberalism, Nationalism, And The Right Of Minorities To Self-determination
【24h】

Rethinking The Boundaries Of Democratic Secession: Liberalism, Nationalism, And The Right Of Minorities To Self-determination

机译:重新思考民主分裂国家的边界​​:自由主义,民族主义和少数群体的自决权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Whereas secession has been dealt with extensively in international law, in connection with the creation and recognition of states, it has received little attention as a possible tool in the constitutional protection of minority rights. This paper examines the more frequent uses and invocations of secession and assesses their potential adaptability as means of promoting minority group rights. It argues that international law and the international community have never provided coherent guidance for responding to nationalistic minority aspirations or, specifically, to secessionist challenges. At the same time, constitutional models regarding the management of national diversity have also failed to reconcile liberal democracy and nationalism. From a substantive point of view, there is probably no solution to such difficulties. Neither available model of "constitutional coexistence" nor of secession is likely, ultimately, to be satisfactory. Nonetheless, the adoption of an explicit constitutional procedural approach to secession provides the best means of averting the worst dangers and excesses.
机译:尽管分裂国家在建立和承认国家方面已被国际法广泛处理,但分裂国家作为宪法保护少数人权利的一种可能工具却很少受到关注。本文研究了分裂国家的更经常使用和援引,并评估了它们作为促进少数群体权利的手段的潜在适应性。它认为,国际法和国际社会从未为应对民族主义的少数民族愿望,特别是对分裂主义的挑战提供一致的指导。同时,关于民族多样性管理的宪法模式也未能调和自由民主与民族主义。从实质的观点来看,可能无法解决这些困难。最终,无论是“宪法共存”模式还是分裂国家模式,都不可能令人满意。尽管如此,对分裂国家采取明确的宪法程序性方法仍是避免最严重危险和过度行为的最佳手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号