...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of computing & information technology >COMPARISON OF BUG DETECTION AND CORRECTION IN JOOMLA 1.5 AND JOOMLA 1.6.
【24h】

COMPARISON OF BUG DETECTION AND CORRECTION IN JOOMLA 1.5 AND JOOMLA 1.6.

机译:JOOMLA 1.5和JOOMLA 1.6中的错误检测和更正的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A statistical comparison was made between the amount of time taken to detect and solve bugs (issues) in Joomla 1.5 and Joomla 1.6 content management system software. Severities of bugs were rated by the project managers as' high, medium high, medium, low and very low. The goal of the comparisons was to determine if there is a significant difference in time needed to detect and correct bugs of various severities within and between projects. Via the comparison, we found out that the difference between times taken to detect and correct various bug severities within each project is not significant with two exceptions. There is a significant difference in the median time to detect bugs of various severities in Joomla 1.5 and a significant difference in the median time to correct bugs in Joomla 1.6.
机译:在Joomla 1.5和Joomla 1.6内容管理系统软件中检测和解决错误(问题)所花费的时间之间进行了统计比较。项目经理将错误的严重程度评为“高,中,高,中,低和非常低”。比较的目的是确定在项目内以及项目之间以及在不同项目之间检测和纠正各种严重性漏洞所需的时间是否存在显着差异。通过比较,我们发现,检测和纠正每个项目中各种错误严重性所花费的时间之间的差异不大,只有两个例外。在Joomla 1.5中,检测各种严重性漏洞的中位数时间存在显着差异,而在Joomla 1.6中,更正错误的中位数时间存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号