首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism >Questioning and responding in the classroom: a cross-disciplinary study of the effects of instructional mediums in academic subjects at a Chinese university
【24h】

Questioning and responding in the classroom: a cross-disciplinary study of the effects of instructional mediums in academic subjects at a Chinese university

机译:课堂中的提问和回应:跨学科研究中国大学教学媒体对学科教学效果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reports on a cross-disciplinary study of the effects of instructional medium and disciplinary background on teacher questions and student responses in 20 subject classes at a Chinese university. These classes were sampled to operationalize the distinction between hard and soft disciplines based on the hypothesis that these two disciplinary clusters may depend on verbal interaction to different extents. Data comprised 20 lessons delivered by different Chinese teachers in their EMI subjects, where both English and Chinese were used as instructional mediums. All the teacher questions and student responses in the lessons were identified, and their cognitive and linguistic complexity were assessed with multiple measures. Analyses revealed that an overwhelming majority of teacher questions and student responses were cognitively and linguistically simple. Instructional medium did not have any statistically significant effect on the incidence, cognitive or syntactic complexity of teacher questions and student responses. The only cross-disciplinary difference found was that student responses in the soft disciplines were syntactically more complex than those in the hard disciplines. These results suggested that questioning and responding in the EMI classrooms were unlikely to achieve the dual goal of facilitating students' subject learning and improving their English proficiency envisioned by policymakers.
机译:本文对一所中国大学的20门学科课程中的教学媒体和学科背景对教师问题和学生反应的影响进行了跨学科研究。基于这两个学科集群可能在不同程度上取决于言语互动的假设,对这些类别进行了抽样,以实现硬学科和软学科之间的区别。数据包括不同中文老师在其EMI课程中讲授的20课,其中英语和汉语均被用作教学语言。确定课程中所有的教师问题和学生的回答,并通过多种措施评估他们的认知和语言复杂性。分析表明,绝大多数老师的问题和学生的回答在认知和语言上都很简单。教学介质对教师提问和学生反应的发生率,认知或句法复杂性没有统计学上的显着影响。发现的唯一跨学科差异是,软学科的学生在语法上比硬学科的学生在语法上更为复杂。这些结果表明,在EMI教室中进行提问和回答不可能实现促进学生学习主题和提高决策者所设想的英语水平的双重目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号