首页> 外文期刊>International Affairs >BRICS countries and the construction of conflict in the Women, Peace and Security Open Debates
【24h】

BRICS countries and the construction of conflict in the Women, Peace and Security Open Debates

机译:金砖国家和妇女冲突的建设,和平与安全开放辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda is a diverse field of practice comprised of numerous actors, activities and artefacts. Conventional accounts of WPS development and implementation tend to reproduce a narrative that positions states located in the global North as 'providers' of WPS, and those in the South as 'recipients'. This assumption in turn prescribes, and proscribes, forms of WPS engagement and has a constitutive effect on the agenda itself, as shown by post- and de-colonial analyses of the WPS agenda. This article seeks to explore the WPS practices of a group of states that in many ways challenge these North/South and provider/recipient binaries by explicitly positioning themselves as operating beyond and across them: the BRICS countries, comprised of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. In this article, we explore how constructions of conflict within the WPS practices of BRICS states relate to the acknowledgement of, and commitment to, the agenda more broadly. We ultimately argue that the BRICS' commitment to the WPS agenda is driven more by identity-making geopolitical considerations, including geostrategic interests, than a politics of peace.
机译:妇女,和平与安全(WPS)议程是由众多行动者,活动和人工制品组成的多样化实践领域。 WPS开发和实施的常规账户倾向于重现一个叙述,该叙述将位于全球北部的国家作为“提供者”以及南方为“收件人”。这种假设依次规定和禁止的WPS订婚,并对议程本身具有本身的本质效果,如WPS议程的后殖民地分析所示。本文旨在探讨一组国家的WPS实践,这些国家在许多方面,通过明确地将自己定位为超越和对面,挑战这些北/南和提供者/受援二进制文件:由巴西,俄罗斯,印度组成的金砖国家,中国和南非。在本文中,我们探讨了在金砖国家的WPS实践中冲突的建设如何更广泛地涉及到议程的承认和承诺。我们最终争辩说,在包括地理位置考虑因素的身份制定的地缘政治因素,包括地球理由,而不是和平的政治,我们对WPS议程的承诺更多地推动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号