首页> 外文学位 >Women as Political Subjects: Discursive Constructions of Women in Peace Processes at the United Nations
【24h】

Women as Political Subjects: Discursive Constructions of Women in Peace Processes at the United Nations

机译:妇女作为政治主体:联合国和平进程中妇女的话语建构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Why, despite all of the rhetoric around women's inclusion sparked by the passage of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325, are women still not included at the table? To answer this question, this study explores the role that language plays in creating reality and how this intersects with gender as a social organizing structure. Taking women's participation in peace processes as the focus, this dissertation contextualizes narratives about women and their inclusion to understand how they are organized and contested and what the implications of such narratives are on women's ability to gain access to peace tables. This study uses feminist critical discourse analysis to look at written narratives from the UN Department of Political Affairs, the UN department responsible for mediation and facilitating peace talks, and the NGO Working Group on Women, Peace and Security, an organization advocating for women's inclusion, putting narratives from the two cases into conversation to understand the benefits, dangers and effectiveness of various arguments used for women's inclusion. It finds that mediation and peace processes are framed as masculine spaces that are defined by the exclusion of feminine characteristics. Despite institutional acknowledgement of the importance of inclusivity, women are discursively constructed as external to mediation processes. Instead, the willingness to use violence or the possession of expert knowledge become primary criteria of access to peace tables. Women are framed through their vulnerability, which delegitimizes their presence at peace tables and reinforces their exclusion from negotiations. These findings are contextualized through an analysis of the justifications for women's presence, revealing a discursive mismatch between the NGO Working Group on Women, Peace and Security and the Department of Political Affairs that has the potential to undermine advocacy efforts and reinforce discursive barriers to women's inclusion.
机译:为什么尽管通过联合国安全理事会第1325号决议引发了围绕女性包容性的种种言论,但为什么仍然没有将女性包括在内?为了回答这个问题,本研究探讨了语言在创造现实中所扮演的角色,以及它如何与性别作为一种社会组织结构相交。本文以妇女参与和平进程为重点,将关于妇女及其包括在内的叙述背景化,以了解它们是如何组织和竞争的,以及这些叙述对妇女获取和平表格的能力有何影响。这项研究使用女权主义批评话语分析法,研究了联合国政治事务部,负责调解和促进和平对话的联合国部门以及倡导妇女融入社会的非政府组织妇女,和平与安全工作组的书面叙述,将这两个案例的叙述进行对话,以了解用于包容女性的各种争论的好处,危险和有效性。研究发现,调解与和平进程被界定为男性空间,而女性空间被排除在外。尽管在制度上承认包容性的重要性,但在调解过程中,女性仍然被认为是包容性的。相反,愿意使用暴力或拥有专家知识成为进入和平表的主要标准。妇女因其脆弱性而陷于困境,这使她们在和平桌上的存在合法化,并加剧了她们被排除在谈判之外的可能性。通过对妇女存在的理由进行分析,将这些调查结果进行了背景分析,揭示了非政府组织妇女,和平与安全工作组与政治事务部之间的话语不匹配,这有可能破坏倡导工作并加强阻碍妇女包容的话语障碍。 。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stearns, Keira.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 189 p.
  • 总页数 189
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号