【24h】

‘Historicising Common Sense’

机译:“使常识具有历史意义”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This essay is an expanded set of comments on the social psychology papers written for the special issue on History and Social Psychology. It considers what social psychology, and particularly the theory of social representations, might offer historians working on similar problems, and what historical methods might offer social psychology. The social history of thinking has been a major theme in twentieth and twenty-first century historical writing, represented most recently by the genre of ‘cultural history’. Cultural history and the theory of social representations have common ancestors in early twentieth-century social science. Nevertheless, the two lines of research have developed in different ways and are better seen as complementary than similar. The theory of social representations usefully foregrounds issues, like social division and change over time, that cultural history relegates to the background. But for historians, the theory of social representations seems oddly fixated on comparing the thought styles associated with positivist science and ‘common sense’. Using historical analysis, this essay tries to dissect the core opposition ‘science : common sense’ and argues for a more flexible approach to comparing modes of thought.
机译:本文是针对历史和社会心理学专刊撰写的社会心理学论文的一组扩展评论。它考虑了什么样的社会心理学,尤其是社会表征理论,可以为历史学家提供解决类似问题的方法,以及什么历史方法可以提供社会心理学。社会思维史一直是20世纪和21世纪历史写作的主要主题,最近以“文化史”的形式为代表。文化史和社会表征理论在20世纪初期的社会科学中有着共同的祖先。尽管如此,这两类研究以不同的方式发展,并且最好被视为互补而不是相似。社会表征理论有益地关注了文化历史沦为背景的问题,例如社会分裂和随着时间的变化。但是对于历史学家来说,社会表征理论似乎固定地比较了与实证主义科学和“常识”相关的思维方式。本文使用历史分析试图剖析核心反对派“科学:常识”,并主张采用一种更为灵活的方法来比较思维方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号