首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >What Are the Important Decisions in the Lives of German and Indian University Students? The Structure of Real-Life Decision-Making Processes
【24h】

What Are the Important Decisions in the Lives of German and Indian University Students? The Structure of Real-Life Decision-Making Processes

机译:德国和印度大学生生活中的重要决定是什么?现实生活中决策流程的结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In intercultural research, bias is sometimes introduced when a methodological approach that was mostly developed within one of the cultures (usually the Western one) is chosen. Instead of identifying and controlling such bias after data collection and during analysis, eliminating and minimizing bias during planning and while conducting the research is much more advisable. Particularly cross-cultural decision-making research has been hindered by the lack of instruments that are equally applicable in different cultures, resulting in biased findings. We have proposed a methodology for comparing cultures that uses qualitative methods and have used it in a comparison of German and Indian students’ most important decision-making situations. In the first study, we identified common and different decision-making situations and recommended major areas for further cross-cultural research on decision making. In the second study, we made an attempt to explore the factors underlying important decision-making areas in the two cultures. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to look for strong similarities and differences between cultures. Transcribed interview data were analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. Several themes were identified and descriptions of factors influencing decision making were derived inductively from interviews with students. Similarities and differences are explained in detail and a further, quantitative survey in different cultures is recommended.
机译:在跨文化研究中,当选择一种主要在一种文化(通常是西方文化)中发展的方法论方法时,有时会引入偏见。与其在数据收集之后和分析期间识别和控制这种偏差,不如在计划过程中以及进行研究时消除和最小化偏差,是更可取的。特别是跨文化决策研究由于缺乏适用于不同文化的工具而受到阻碍,从而导致研究结果出现偏差。我们提出了一种使用定性方法进行文化比较的方法,并将其用于比较德国和印度学生最重要的决策情况。在第一项研究中,我们确定了共同的和不同的决策情况,并建议了主要领域,以便进一步进行决策的跨文化研究。在第二项研究中,我们尝试探索两种文化中重要决策领域的基础因素。进行了半结构化访谈,以寻找不同文化之间的强烈异同。使用主题分析对转录的访谈数据进行定性分析。确定了几个主题,并通过与学生的访谈归纳得出了影响决策的因素的描述。详细介绍了异同,并建议进一步对不同文化进行定量调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号