首页> 外文期刊>Innovation: Organization & Management >Environmental innovation approaches and business performance: effects of environmental regulations and resource commitment
【24h】

Environmental innovation approaches and business performance: effects of environmental regulations and resource commitment

机译:环境创新方法和业务绩效:环境法规和资源承诺的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates whether environmental regulations andrnresource commitment (RC) can motivate manufacturers to engagernin environmental innovation, thereby improving their businessrnperformance. This study proposes a multidimensional frameworkrnof ‘Regulation–Innovation–Performance’ as an extension of thernPorter Hypothesis, and examines the effect of RC on environmentalrninnovation simultaneously. In this study, environmental regulationsrnare categorised into command-and-control regulations (CCR) andrnmarket-based regulations (MBR). Innovative approaches are classifiedrnas either exploratory or exploitative environmental innovations.rnBusiness performance is divided into measures of effectiveness andrnefficiency. Further, this study employs the partial least-squares methodrnto analyse 166 sets of sample data from Taiwanese manufacturersrnto verify the hypotheses. The results reveal that CCR positivelyrnaffect both exploratory and exploitative environmental innovationrnapproaches. By contrast, MBR have a significant positive effect only onrnexploratory environmental innovation. This study finds RC to be thernmain determinant in both environmental innovation approaches. Inrnaddition, although exploratory environmental innovation is beneficialrnin terms of enhancing firm effectiveness, no significant correlation withrnfirm efficiency was observed. Exploitative environmental innovationrnis positively and significantly associated with firms’ effective andrnefficient performance.
机译:这项研究调查了环境法规和资源承诺(RC)是否可以激励制造商进行环境创新,从而提高其业务绩效。这项研究提出了“监管—创新—绩效”的多维框架,作为“波特假说”的扩展,并同时考察了RC对环境创新的影响。在本研究中,环境法规分为命令与控制法规(CCR)和基于市场的法规(MBR)。创新方法可分为探索性或开发性环境创新。业务绩效分为有效性和效率的度量。此外,本研究采用偏最小二乘方法分析了来自台湾制造商的166组样本数据,以验证假设。结果表明,CCR积极地影响探索性和开发性环境创新方法。相比之下,MBR仅对探索性环境创新具有显着的积极作用。这项研究发现,RC是两种环境创新方法中的主要决定因素。此外,尽管探索性环境创新在提高公司效力方面是有益的,但未观察到与公司效率显着相关。开发性环境创新与企业的有效和低效绩效密切相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号